There were a few 4-person bands in the 50s pop scene, but it was rare. And there usually wasn't a drummer. Led Zeppelin explained they were breaking up after their drummer died, not so much out of grief but b/c he realky created & set the beat for the songs. A replacement drummer would never work, Plant claimed.
So it was usually 3 guitarists & 1 drummer, 1 or usually 2 of the guitarists singing. It did have a very different feel. And a hair style adopted by all 4. It didn't feel 'managed', it was like the band created their band appearance, music genre, their own written songs, & the performance style. It all felt new, & the guys in each band were in their early 20s.
I appreciate very much what you’re doing here, even though my views are in many ways strongly at odds with yours. Personally, psychedelics have both opened my mind and strengthened my capacity to reject falsehoods. I would argue that it is never the drug that will cripple the user, but inadequate usage. Which certainly was common practice in the sixties, I am under no illusions there.
Yeah, I was an enthusiastic consumer of the counterculture and its gifts. The shadow side was the thing the regime went for, twisted to its purpose and destroyed. Great tragedy.
Indeed. And assuming you don't just appear to know what you're talking about - because I haven't done my due diligence on a lot of this stuff yet - you are doing some pretty heavy lifting bringing the originators of that tragedy to light. Again, much appreciated.
I am 65 now and as I look back upon the events in history, my hindsight is 20/20. Somewhere along the line in the recent past it clicked in my oft overloaded nogen that the destruction to "build back better" has been and is deliberate. The question that remains unanswered for me is, why? Are they (the infamous 'they') not also destroying themselves in the process? Do they believe they are immune to the poisons they spew? Do they think that when net-zero is accomplished they'll somehow be able to breathe without oxygen? Do they think that they'll have health and live indefinite lives after they destroy all natural (re)sources and meld themselves with self-assembling nanotechnology and implanted brain chips? In the end they will have power and control over nothing. But I guess that's the point - to destroy and control what's left. Though, if they continue on the current path there will be nothing left, and it will be they who will be the victims of their own destruction; they're just unable to see that.
Also if you look into opportunity zones you can see very clear evidence into the way drugs are used to control the population. I have had a lot of moments on acid where I thought I was going to figure out the meaning of life, but it never happened, not until I finally realized that Jesus Christ died for my sins, and all of my years of searching were in vain until that particular moment. I learned the hard way, through articles like this one, and digging into the creation of money, then tracing the families back that created the money. I had to find the existence of Satan before I was able to know god. I really hope it’s not that way for everyone, but whatever works!!
I do not for a second think that you went to far on this article. I also question what to far means exactly in reference to previous posts? To far doesnt imply that you are wrong, and if you’ve gone to far in the way of feelings, then the feelings hurt are not feelings of importance, if they would stand in the way of truth. Blunt honesty should always come before feelings, sugar coating things is lying, it is also weakness. I applaud your article keep pushing. There’s a lot of evil, small minded people out there that would love to see you loose your soul to what they so deviously pass off as art. Keep up the good work, thank you for the time you spent putting this information together, it definitely helped me with some questions I had.
Thank you. They were pushing drugs into China in 1723. So that is at least 300 years of experience using drugs to control a population. I feel they have created the illusion “ they want to kill us “ so we defend our life not our body. They can’t have our Soul but they have most of our minds and bodies. I think the science they are into is way more advanced than they let us know. That makes it a lot harder to comprehend what they are doing to us.
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. I refuse to accept the notion that the "Boomer" generation is somehow contaminated or have been used more than any other generation. On the contrary, we were at the forefront of a revolution of consciousness that is still underway.
Bleating victimization plays into the plans of the dark side. Sorry, you're just flat out wrong!
Portland, Oregon is full of NonParticipatingCharacters! The politicians running the place are NPCs! These sociopaths ARE keeping Portland weird. Anyone who wants to see what a community of NPCs looks like, come visit Portland. For that matter, San Francisco is another west coast option I can recommend.
Liked the article. But I have to push-back on one of your ideas:
" it’s all an attempt to gain unearned power through various nasty practices which end in nearly every case, in human sacrifice. Even Buddhism. "
That is a pretty broad brush, painting all Buddhism, that way. Buddhism in 2500 years has morphed into thousands of sects, everything from a-religious practitioners of deep meditation, to worshipers of the Buddha, to blood-drinkers apparently. I think you would have a pretty hard time finding a sect that actually committed human sacrifice. The entire huge branch of Theravaden buddhism that I am personally a practitioner of, has absolutely no focus on any sort of unearned power, unless you think working to purify one's mind of negativities results in some sort of unearned power. The essence of buddhism is not harming any being and purifying the mind. Obviously some sects have gone far beyond that. My meditative practice cured me of severe depression of 14 years standing and more than a dozen other severe mental-emotional conditions that prevented me from participating positively in life. That is certainly power but definitely not unearned. It was earned through in total, months of hard work on the meditation cushion. Please read through this website (www.dhamma.org) before you defame Buddhism in general, again. If you want to refer to a particular blood drinking sect, I suppose you can but it has no bearing on Buddhism in general.
I was simply making the point that a) most 'religions default to human sacrifice and b) that Buddhism encourages passivity. Which it does. I have practiced anapanasati for 25 years now, but it is adjunct to a vivid, active, intimate relationship with God.
Meditation as a practice is good. The ability to feel quietness at will is very important. But on its own? It is morally neutral. It, without morality, just makes people more egocentric. I have spent many months in deep meditation. Silent for weeks at a time. Many many 1000s of hours in prayer and quietness. Without a decision to be good and to try to seek God, and it at best will make you slightly more powerfully able to accomplish selfish goals. That’s it. All the ‘quiet’ philosophies lead to selfishness and ultimately to ineffectiveness in the world.
I think the 60s peoples and the Boomers in general are THE most corrupted generation of all time. They got the Viet Nam war right. But that was about it. A surge of reasonably unproductive creativity was emitted. But most of the real creativity came before Flower Power. Not after. And much of what the 60s spawned was terrible. Drugs, anti-children, feminism, licentiousness. And so on. Almost everything they did hurt people. And like all great lies there was a bit of truth in each of it. Feminism for about 15 minutes was valuable, for example. ‘Make love, Not war’ has some truth. But only some. International Marxism turned it on its head to create drugged zombies. The leaders it produced have been by and large horrible. Bill Clinton, George Bush, Obama, Hillary, Nancy. Etc. Disasters. By and large the nicer kinder female leaders were in fact mean girls who made the big time. At one point every leader of a major European country was childless!! Pathetic. The Boomers destroyed medicine, education, and pretty much everything they turned their glances toward.
I think you should be a little clearer in your intent. Referring to [all] Buddhism after mentioning blood drinking, nasty practices, followed by human sacrifice, sounds like you are implying murder and maybe cannibalism. What sort of human sacrifice are you referring to? I dont know of any in the core practices or beliefs of Buddhism, which are dont harm any being and purify your mind. And I dispute that Buddhism encourages passivity any more than any other religion. I think that many religions that are waiting for some savior to come along encourage more passivity, than Buddhism. I saw it stated that the Buddha asks one to take refuge in Not taking refuge i.e. its up to you alone, with his and the Sanga's guidance, to become a better person. No god is going to save you. In Buddhism you have to actively be a good person, your belief system is mostly irrelevant; compared to most religions where your beliefs are of prime importance. There are many examples of Buddhists who are active in social movements.
Masks in all their forms are a sign of NPC. I avoid these people. I would offer help except there is no chance of turning that light back on. Sad and scary.
The disguised snake in the garden of modernism is the depopulation agenda. Elizabeth's link to statements made by familiar, popular figures is eye-opening, frightening. This notion of the utter necessity of depopulation is akin to our modern original sin. It turns good people into their opposite. "We have dozens of statements out there by various admired people. Read these and then tell me they aren’t trying to kill us. It is hardly a secret."
Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov documented the active measures by the communists in the USSR against the U.S. post WWII but never did I imagine how deep and wide was the conspiracy from within. This is truly hard to believe unless one takes a look at the unrecognizable world we live in today. I wonder, does the marxist concept of useful idiots still hold or are we all, in some fashion, the useful idiots of these behaviorists in the intelligence community?
Good point! Bezmenov was pointing out all of this in the 1970s. So many of these commenters just have their fingers in their ears like children. Brainwashing really works!
And I applaud (our) now awakening -non woke- state of being. Nicholas Wades’ The Faith Instinct identifies the Woodstockian Trance-based earliest forms of worship. Likely Mr Dulles had as well! Some exceptional dot connections in this piece. Huzzah Elizabeth!
I suspect I'll be re-reading this astonishing dive into Hades in the coming months. I wish I could talk to Bowie on this, get his take on the guided 'counter-culture', of which he was a huge sceptic. But that aside, Nickson's quoting Arendt's surprise at how banal Eichmann was, that evokes for me the pandemic leaders - Trudeau, Ardern (the frozen rictus smile), et al.
I see the 33' Clipper this weekend, to buy, & in which God willing I'll escape the coming Pandemos 2.0. 😵💫
One of my favourite musicians tells his story:
https://real-left.com/no-conspiracies-please-were-reality-theorists/
Still going on only the science has evolved.... https://www.targetedjustice.com
There were a few 4-person bands in the 50s pop scene, but it was rare. And there usually wasn't a drummer. Led Zeppelin explained they were breaking up after their drummer died, not so much out of grief but b/c he realky created & set the beat for the songs. A replacement drummer would never work, Plant claimed.
So it was usually 3 guitarists & 1 drummer, 1 or usually 2 of the guitarists singing. It did have a very different feel. And a hair style adopted by all 4. It didn't feel 'managed', it was like the band created their band appearance, music genre, their own written songs, & the performance style. It all felt new, & the guys in each band were in their early 20s.
I appreciate very much what you’re doing here, even though my views are in many ways strongly at odds with yours. Personally, psychedelics have both opened my mind and strengthened my capacity to reject falsehoods. I would argue that it is never the drug that will cripple the user, but inadequate usage. Which certainly was common practice in the sixties, I am under no illusions there.
Anyway, many thanks!
Yeah, I was an enthusiastic consumer of the counterculture and its gifts. The shadow side was the thing the regime went for, twisted to its purpose and destroyed. Great tragedy.
Indeed. And assuming you don't just appear to know what you're talking about - because I haven't done my due diligence on a lot of this stuff yet - you are doing some pretty heavy lifting bringing the originators of that tragedy to light. Again, much appreciated.
I am 65 now and as I look back upon the events in history, my hindsight is 20/20. Somewhere along the line in the recent past it clicked in my oft overloaded nogen that the destruction to "build back better" has been and is deliberate. The question that remains unanswered for me is, why? Are they (the infamous 'they') not also destroying themselves in the process? Do they believe they are immune to the poisons they spew? Do they think that when net-zero is accomplished they'll somehow be able to breathe without oxygen? Do they think that they'll have health and live indefinite lives after they destroy all natural (re)sources and meld themselves with self-assembling nanotechnology and implanted brain chips? In the end they will have power and control over nothing. But I guess that's the point - to destroy and control what's left. Though, if they continue on the current path there will be nothing left, and it will be they who will be the victims of their own destruction; they're just unable to see that.
Also if you look into opportunity zones you can see very clear evidence into the way drugs are used to control the population. I have had a lot of moments on acid where I thought I was going to figure out the meaning of life, but it never happened, not until I finally realized that Jesus Christ died for my sins, and all of my years of searching were in vain until that particular moment. I learned the hard way, through articles like this one, and digging into the creation of money, then tracing the families back that created the money. I had to find the existence of Satan before I was able to know god. I really hope it’s not that way for everyone, but whatever works!!
I do not for a second think that you went to far on this article. I also question what to far means exactly in reference to previous posts? To far doesnt imply that you are wrong, and if you’ve gone to far in the way of feelings, then the feelings hurt are not feelings of importance, if they would stand in the way of truth. Blunt honesty should always come before feelings, sugar coating things is lying, it is also weakness. I applaud your article keep pushing. There’s a lot of evil, small minded people out there that would love to see you loose your soul to what they so deviously pass off as art. Keep up the good work, thank you for the time you spent putting this information together, it definitely helped me with some questions I had.
Elizabeth, I think you have gone too far on that one. I definitely would not give you 100%.
Thank you. They were pushing drugs into China in 1723. So that is at least 300 years of experience using drugs to control a population. I feel they have created the illusion “ they want to kill us “ so we defend our life not our body. They can’t have our Soul but they have most of our minds and bodies. I think the science they are into is way more advanced than they let us know. That makes it a lot harder to comprehend what they are doing to us.
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. I refuse to accept the notion that the "Boomer" generation is somehow contaminated or have been used more than any other generation. On the contrary, we were at the forefront of a revolution of consciousness that is still underway.
Bleating victimization plays into the plans of the dark side. Sorry, you're just flat out wrong!
Portland, Oregon is full of NonParticipatingCharacters! The politicians running the place are NPCs! These sociopaths ARE keeping Portland weird. Anyone who wants to see what a community of NPCs looks like, come visit Portland. For that matter, San Francisco is another west coast option I can recommend.
Liked the article. But I have to push-back on one of your ideas:
" it’s all an attempt to gain unearned power through various nasty practices which end in nearly every case, in human sacrifice. Even Buddhism. "
That is a pretty broad brush, painting all Buddhism, that way. Buddhism in 2500 years has morphed into thousands of sects, everything from a-religious practitioners of deep meditation, to worshipers of the Buddha, to blood-drinkers apparently. I think you would have a pretty hard time finding a sect that actually committed human sacrifice. The entire huge branch of Theravaden buddhism that I am personally a practitioner of, has absolutely no focus on any sort of unearned power, unless you think working to purify one's mind of negativities results in some sort of unearned power. The essence of buddhism is not harming any being and purifying the mind. Obviously some sects have gone far beyond that. My meditative practice cured me of severe depression of 14 years standing and more than a dozen other severe mental-emotional conditions that prevented me from participating positively in life. That is certainly power but definitely not unearned. It was earned through in total, months of hard work on the meditation cushion. Please read through this website (www.dhamma.org) before you defame Buddhism in general, again. If you want to refer to a particular blood drinking sect, I suppose you can but it has no bearing on Buddhism in general.
I was simply making the point that a) most 'religions default to human sacrifice and b) that Buddhism encourages passivity. Which it does. I have practiced anapanasati for 25 years now, but it is adjunct to a vivid, active, intimate relationship with God.
Meditation as a practice is good. The ability to feel quietness at will is very important. But on its own? It is morally neutral. It, without morality, just makes people more egocentric. I have spent many months in deep meditation. Silent for weeks at a time. Many many 1000s of hours in prayer and quietness. Without a decision to be good and to try to seek God, and it at best will make you slightly more powerfully able to accomplish selfish goals. That’s it. All the ‘quiet’ philosophies lead to selfishness and ultimately to ineffectiveness in the world.
I think the 60s peoples and the Boomers in general are THE most corrupted generation of all time. They got the Viet Nam war right. But that was about it. A surge of reasonably unproductive creativity was emitted. But most of the real creativity came before Flower Power. Not after. And much of what the 60s spawned was terrible. Drugs, anti-children, feminism, licentiousness. And so on. Almost everything they did hurt people. And like all great lies there was a bit of truth in each of it. Feminism for about 15 minutes was valuable, for example. ‘Make love, Not war’ has some truth. But only some. International Marxism turned it on its head to create drugged zombies. The leaders it produced have been by and large horrible. Bill Clinton, George Bush, Obama, Hillary, Nancy. Etc. Disasters. By and large the nicer kinder female leaders were in fact mean girls who made the big time. At one point every leader of a major European country was childless!! Pathetic. The Boomers destroyed medicine, education, and pretty much everything they turned their glances toward.
I think you should be a little clearer in your intent. Referring to [all] Buddhism after mentioning blood drinking, nasty practices, followed by human sacrifice, sounds like you are implying murder and maybe cannibalism. What sort of human sacrifice are you referring to? I dont know of any in the core practices or beliefs of Buddhism, which are dont harm any being and purify your mind. And I dispute that Buddhism encourages passivity any more than any other religion. I think that many religions that are waiting for some savior to come along encourage more passivity, than Buddhism. I saw it stated that the Buddha asks one to take refuge in Not taking refuge i.e. its up to you alone, with his and the Sanga's guidance, to become a better person. No god is going to save you. In Buddhism you have to actively be a good person, your belief system is mostly irrelevant; compared to most religions where your beliefs are of prime importance. There are many examples of Buddhists who are active in social movements.
Not now, but a hundred years ago.
Masks in all their forms are a sign of NPC. I avoid these people. I would offer help except there is no chance of turning that light back on. Sad and scary.
The disguised snake in the garden of modernism is the depopulation agenda. Elizabeth's link to statements made by familiar, popular figures is eye-opening, frightening. This notion of the utter necessity of depopulation is akin to our modern original sin. It turns good people into their opposite. "We have dozens of statements out there by various admired people. Read these and then tell me they aren’t trying to kill us. It is hardly a secret."
Truly horrific.
http://thebridgelifeinthemix.info/united-nations/quotes-insane-depopulation/
👀s opening! They hate us these greedy SOBs!
Soviet defector Yuri Bezmenov documented the active measures by the communists in the USSR against the U.S. post WWII but never did I imagine how deep and wide was the conspiracy from within. This is truly hard to believe unless one takes a look at the unrecognizable world we live in today. I wonder, does the marxist concept of useful idiots still hold or are we all, in some fashion, the useful idiots of these behaviorists in the intelligence community?
Good point! Bezmenov was pointing out all of this in the 1970s. So many of these commenters just have their fingers in their ears like children. Brainwashing really works!
We have all been brainwashed, every single one of us.
And I applaud (our) now awakening -non woke- state of being. Nicholas Wades’ The Faith Instinct identifies the Woodstockian Trance-based earliest forms of worship. Likely Mr Dulles had as well! Some exceptional dot connections in this piece. Huzzah Elizabeth!
I suspect I'll be re-reading this astonishing dive into Hades in the coming months. I wish I could talk to Bowie on this, get his take on the guided 'counter-culture', of which he was a huge sceptic. But that aside, Nickson's quoting Arendt's surprise at how banal Eichmann was, that evokes for me the pandemic leaders - Trudeau, Ardern (the frozen rictus smile), et al.
I see the 33' Clipper this weekend, to buy, & in which God willing I'll escape the coming Pandemos 2.0. 😵💫
Bowie was deep in the occult, an obvious follower of Aleister Crowley like most of these musicians.