205 Comments

Somehow in the last little while (few hundred years) some folks have been convinced that what has been working for a few thousand years (our Christian faith), the way we pair-up, support families, raise children for the last, what, 25,000 years, 50,000 years, 2,500,000 years, needs to be completely thrown out and replaced with its complete opposite. How's that been workin' for ya?

Where does this come from? Pride - arrogance - the source of all sin - Satan. Go ahead and say it: it's Satanic. I've gone along with the crowd and it flat doesn't work, I've repented and am working to get turned around. God help me!

Expand full comment

Once upon a time decades ago, I was a female working in a male dominated field. At times, my job was physically challenging, and I could never do what a man could do. As a woman, I do not and will never have the same upper body strength as the average man. I accepted this, and, when an issue came up, my male co-workers helped me.

However, many of my female co-workers did NOT accept this. "Guuurl Power" and all. They treated the men badly and, as a result, THEY were treated badly. In my mind they lived in a fantasy world in regards to their abilities.

They were sold on "men and women are totally equal." And this was decades ago; I'm sure it's worse now. And... it's simply arrogance on the part of women. And yes, it's Satanic.

Expand full comment

A comment with plenty of practical wisdom for modern women and girls.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18·edited Jun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Interesting point regarding equality and sameness. I think part of the reason that equality = sameness is due to the movie industry. How many films have we seen in which small, thin women literally beat up larger, stronger men with ease? On some level, I think many women want to believe that they are capable of doing that, because feminism has made them feel less than equal. Aka "being a man is the ideal, so I must prove I can do everything a man can do to be ideal."

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

What's funny in my former job is that I could do things that many of the men didn't have the patience to do, and they appreciated the tasks that I did.

The men seemed happy that I acknowledged our differences, and that I didn't try to negate their contribution. Conversely, they appreciated me, and when I needed help, they did not hesitate to step up without being asked. I think it's called mutual respect.

/it's OK to have different abilities

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

You miss the obvious which is that women must move forward in trust and that is why marriage is sacred, it is necessary to seek God’s grace in this dynamic, what you call ‘undignified’

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

22Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the Saviour of the body. 24Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. 25Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; 26That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, 27That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. 28So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. -- Ephesians Ch. 5

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 28
Comment removed
Expand full comment

God abosolutely DOES demand that women submit to men. Also that Christ submits to Father, and men submit to Christ.

Your beloved Egalite and Feminism have driven nations of the West to the brink of collapse.

Expand full comment

6,000 years, if you're referencing the Scriptural text rather than evolutionary theories.

Expand full comment

Well said. It will require the Holy Spirit changing people’s heart through the Gospel, evangelism based on truths and sound preaching in churches. It will happen someday.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this.

I am a supporter of femininity, not feminism.

Women should be protected.

Expand full comment

THANK-YOU FOR YOUR COMMENT.

Expand full comment

I wish I had a good man in my life to protect and love me. Mine of 35 years fell prey to the social engineering and liberal feminist ideology. His status in the community demanded it of him...my story:

https://risingdawn360.substack.com/p/the-disintegration-of-the-family

https://risingdawn360.substack.com/p/four-corners-of-the-earth-rediscovered

Expand full comment

I opened the link and skimmed your story. I was shocked to see you believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories and that the earth is flat.

Expand full comment

Most would consider him an expert on the subject of the 9/11 coverup...

https://jermwarfare.com/conversations/andrew-johnson-on-the-cover-up-of-the-9-11-cover-up

Expand full comment

Ma’am, I’m sorry, but no serious scientist believes the earth is flat. Your 20 years of personal research cannot possibly compete with centuries of data, observations, and study. This is my last comment. I don’t have time to engage in discussions about certifiably wacky theories.

Expand full comment

God doesn’t lie but a lot of people have some whacked, twisted interpretations of his truth. The irony of you telling me to “do research lady” is laughable.

Expand full comment

I also believe God cannot lie and men do all the time. There are over 200 verses to support a level, stationary earth in the Bible. You'd have to believe in fairy tales to accept NASA's (Not A Space Agency) impossiBALL story. If we were flying through space, don't you think the Bible would have at least ONE verse mentioning it? Do some research, lady. You appear to "trust the scientism theories."

Expand full comment

God doesn’t lie but a lot of people have some whacked, twisted interpretations of his truth. The irony of you telling me to “do research lady” is laughable.

Expand full comment

I’ve studied it over twenty years, almost daily. I just believe what it says, to whom it says it. I can give you twenty verses making your rotating ball impossible. Can you give me one to support your theory?

Expand full comment

Women should take responsibility for self-protection.

Expand full comment

Yes. A man is not a plan. I mean I have an awesome boyfriend who wants to provide for me and protect me and I let him do it, but I am not counting on him to always be able to do that. Disability and death happens, no matter how decent a person is there are things beyond our control. I saw that growing up and it was a big part of my decision to not have kids unless I could find a way to provide for them and homeschool them at the same time. Men are awesome but you have to have a backup plan, just as they should have a backup plan for women and know how to cook decently and keep the house reasonably clean with minimal time investment.

Expand full comment

I see many cats in your future.

Expand full comment

Right. I like how you assume that because I want a backup plan so I can properly raise my kids that my boyfriend and I are not planning to adopt in the future.

Besides, I hate cats with a passion. The only crazy cat lady I know has 2 adult children who are trying to liquidate her estate and stick her in a nursing home even though she is still competent and living independently. Her husband died 5 years ago, after cheating on her multiple times, including having another child with a mistress. Fortunately for the crazy cat lady her divorce lawyer sucked so they were still legally married when he died so she's got his pension.

Expand full comment

. . . and boxed wine. I see boxed wine too.

Expand full comment

Oh darn, the not in my last comment must have been autocorrect. We are planning to adopt once financially able to properly raise kids.

I don't even like wine. Got any more assumptions?

Expand full comment

Women are awesome, but a man has to have a backup plan.

Expand full comment

One must deliberately effect control to have any hope of retaining it.

Expand full comment

You would then live in a spiritual vacuum

Expand full comment

Spirit being a non-locality, a vacuum would be impossible.

Expand full comment

Biology: women are physically weaker than men and are at a great disadvantage if assaulted. They also create life.

Why would you not want to help protect something so precious?

Expand full comment

Women should though. We all must take care of ourselves. Men though should see themselves as protectors too. But some women seem to be oblivious to their surroundings.

Expand full comment

Caitlin Clark must be an exception.

Because it is unknown to me by its own inaction.

Expand full comment

I agree and presumably you would agree that there is no need for women to compete on separate playing fields, basketball courts or swimming pools. For example there is no need for a women only WNBA or men only NFL/NBA/etc. Caitlin Clark could easily be a top scorer in the male NBA! Plus, we conscription for war should not be males only since women can protect themselves. You agree Vonu or are you going to back down like a schooled bitch?

Expand full comment

I'll agree to it. One thing I learned from Leah Thomas is that women have no business being in sports. Except rhythmic gymnastics. Let's see a man change genders to compete there.

While I oppose any draft of anyone, we should allow women into any role they they are capable of performing, you're shooting yourself in the foot otherwise.

Expand full comment

I am fine with women being in sports as long as they are not isolated and separated from males; we should have equal and inclusive playing fields, pools and courts. No reason to be sexist and exclude them or anyone else from competing against both or all genders.

Expand full comment

All of that can begin as soon as men can survive labor.

Expand full comment

Lol. You sure caved quick. From women are equal to only equal when males can survive labor. Folded like a cheap suit. Next!

Expand full comment

As least I'm not imagining things.

Expand full comment

Sure you are, you imagined women can protect themselves as well as men. At least you implied it. Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight and don’t bring a woman to a fight with men.

Expand full comment

Trans women survive get pregnant and survive labor all the time don’t ya know. Such a conservative putz.

Expand full comment

You must be a Chase Oliver libertarian.

Expand full comment

More Ron Paul. Really got into it as both protest to bailouts and against wars the neocons were and continue to push. Myself and 4 brothers served in the military and we’re opposed to neocon wars.

Expand full comment

How's that working out for you? Tuco has 24 likes at this point and you? One.

Expand full comment

Tuco was a candidate for the LP nomination?

Expand full comment

This is a fantastic discussion. I don't think it's a coincidence that as religious involvement has waned, deception in the form of feminism has flourished. Also, I see the big picture as a global agenda to reduce births through indoctrination; part of their whole genocidal scheme.

Expand full comment

Agree. The whole goal of the 'global agenda' has been to destroy the family, traditional values, and self-reliance, so as to foster a dependence on the state to meet all of our needs. Increase tax rates to force wives out of the home into the job market, for instance.

Once viewed through that lens, it all becomes clear. And it is obvious that it has all been planned, since the 1960s at least and likely longer.

Expand full comment

A bit of an anecdote: this past weekend, I attended a traditional Latin mass. One might expect it to be filled with old women; it was not. In fact, the majority there were young families with multiple children. As in "four children under five years old." Was the congregation huge? No. But then again, it is not in an area that has a huge Catholic population. But there were no tattoos, no weird hair and no disrespectful clothes.

A fun fact: Vatican II took place in the early to mid 1960s. Coincidence?

Expand full comment

Nope. Vatican II was part of the show. The Catholic Church, along with every other church that has been around long enough to have a central authority structure, has long been corrupted by the Cabal. Like with all such organizations (the Freemasons come to mind) the 'local' people are fine folks, blissfully unaware of the evil perpetrated at the top of the organization. And many of the higher-level people also refuse to be compromised. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò is an example; there are many others in the Catholic Church as in the other churches and organizations. Evil runs deep, but people of good will are fighting it. (Viganò even refuses to call the current Pope by his papal name -- still calls him 'Bergoglio.')

Expand full comment

Yeah, I know Vatican II was part of the process. And I'm a big fan of Vigano.

The book "Windswept House" by Malachi Martin is a VERY interesting read. Fact disguised as fiction. BTW... Klaus Schwab is a minor character that makes a brief appearance.

https://www.amazon.com/Windswept-House-Vatican-Malachi-Martin/dp/0385492316/ref=sr_1_1?sr=8-1

Expand full comment

Apparently Viganò's disrespect was too much for Bergoglio, who has summoned Viganò to the Vatican to face excommunication:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/exclusive-archbishop-carlo-maria-vigano-summoned-vatican-be/

Expand full comment

Thanks, I'll have to check it out 💖

Expand full comment
Jun 17·edited Jun 17

This is the new reformation within the Roman Church. Vatican 2 was a mistake. The people are searching for a return to ancient traditions and forms of worship. As a Protestant, I find this to be very healthy. We have done similar things in our traditional denominations as each of the well know churches have already split over theological issues.

Expand full comment

Female-centered cults have been the prime adversary of Christianity and Christians for millennia. Read the Bible, especially the account of Elijah, Jehu, Jezebel, and the House of Ahab. Or read James Frazer. Tells the same truth, really. Modern Christianity is feminized and woke-ified. Modern Christian men are gelded, subjugated to their wives and daughters, like their secular brethren.

The religion of America -- and the religion that America disperses by force or bribery throughout the planet -- is feminism and its offshoot, woke. Which is what political correctness used to be called.

Expand full comment
Jun 17·edited Jun 17

Orthodox, traditional Christianity is increasing, outside of the old line mainline Protestant denominations. There is a stronger focus on marriage and child bearing. Our small church has many babies. Many of our mothers mostly homeschool and the fathers are the sole breadwinner. Everyone is more happy. Struggles? Of course. Unity? Absolutely.

All Elders and Deacons are men of character. Lord’s Day by Lord’s Day, we worship in old fashioned ways with much love within the congregation among the people. No laptop computers and no rock and rock bands.

Expand full comment

The only American Protestant denomination that is growing in membership is the PCA, the Presbyterian Church in America.

We are those scary hardliner Calvinists who dare to exposit Scripture verbatim from our pulpits, and expect that our congregations understand that we who believe are being sanctified, becoming in God's eyes equal in holiness to His son Jesus.

Expand full comment
Jun 18·edited Jun 19

Calvin made sense. There are others that join with the PCA that are similar. Sanctification takes a lifetime. We are all still sinners. I don’t wish to bash our Roman Catholic, nor our Eastern Orthodox brothers and sisters at all. King Jesus know His sheep, He will call them, and they will follow. In the in between times now, we teach in our little church…

Sola Scriptura

Our goal is to live Corum Deo, directly living in the face of our Lord and Saviour, King Jesus. On this earth it would kill us to see Him now in His Glorified body. On the Day of the Lord, the parousia, we will see Him face to face and King Jesus will give us our Glorified bodies, completely freed from sin. No more pain, no more suffering, no more disease, no more war, no more death. No more tears. Even for our loved family members who do not join us there. Not sure how. Human beings have extremely small brains and little imagination for what is possible. Jesus said “in my house there will be many mansions”.

This is our only hope. The blood of Jesus Christ at Calvary is our only righteousness.

“Jesus did it all, all to Him we owe, sin had left a crimson stain, He washed it white as snow.” Praise God from whom all blessings flow.

Expand full comment

Excellent conversation! Thank you both. I completely agree. Women can stay home and nurture their husband and children, then work at a later time if they wish. I’ve seen it work happily.

Expand full comment

I’m certain that I was born to care for a woman and our children, and to the extent that she feels the same more the blessing.

But I’m only one man, I’ve no interest in changing the competitive women who would be a poor fit anyway, so I found myself that woman, she had my children, God called her home and now my family is my children and grandchildren.

You awakened women can live as you please, but I’ll dodge you like potholes.

Expand full comment
Jun 17Liked by elizabeth nickson

Now that Elizabeth is getting the numbers that she is, it's important to remember the first thing that we learned back in the early years of the Internet Relay Chat:

Don't Feed the Trolls!

Expand full comment

>Doctors are subject to malpractice claims if an intervention causes infertility. But no consequences befall a therapist whose advice is responsible for wasting a woman’s youth. Similarly, if you would go to a priest for advice, the religious agenda is readily apparent. Now, those who press on the levers of people’s life choices are allowed to give the impression they are unbiased and set above the trivial archaic notions of religion. They enjoy the esteem of being all-knowing about human psychology, while refusing to admit the most obvious truths.<

A thought provoking comment.

Expand full comment

What are the most obvious truths?

Expand full comment

You truly do not know or even perceive the answer after reading this excellent discussion??

Hint: Wrong-headed feminist-brainwashed psychologists & psychiatrists are not held liable for misleading, misdirecting their patients (notably the female ones) into making choices that further the patients' stress, anxieties, and misery up to even ruining their lives. The professional shrinks keep their taped sessions private (doctor-patient privacy) so that their potentially destructive guidance cannot be at least shown in a courtroom to have taken the patient in a dangerous and further negative direction. Contrast this against a harmful / deadly outcome from medical treatment or surgery, where the physician may be proven by the physical evidence to have committed malpractice.

Expand full comment

Obvious truths seldom appear in opinion pieces.

If they weren't elucidated in the instant opinion piece, I doubt you are going to improve on it.

Expand full comment

I won't argue your point since you apparently realize that obvious truths *DO* sometimes appear in opinion pieces (like this one); hence your choice of the adverb, "seldom"....

Expand full comment

A very frank and refreshing dialogue here, much appreciated.

Expand full comment

It feels so good to have found a nice rural Eastern Orthodox Church with tons of kids and families. Our priest is on number four of his own! I love singing the baptisms and renewing my faith that God will preserve His remnant until the end of time.

Expand full comment

Another Orthodox mother! Hello from Northern Canada!

Expand full comment

Glory to God the faith is everywhere! I'm not a mother just a single guy, not sure if that's what my profile pic looks like (I think it's just some Jewish American tourist kids that I thought were funny a decade or so ago).

Expand full comment

I found this passage in an ancient Book…

“Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. "Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh." This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.”

‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭5‬:‭22‬-‭33‬

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 17·edited Jun 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Should have read the whole thing. The man has the most difficult part in a way. To love as Christ loved… nothing like sharia law.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment

It is the Law of Christ, that appeals to hearts.

How different is respect from submit?

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 17·edited Jun 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment

False equivalence. You seem to be brainwashed and unable to think critically. Outside of the current popular culture. Popular culture is totally evil and highly destructive to human prosperity and happiness. Get educated and learn something real . That is the entire purpose of this excellent piece.

Expand full comment
Jun 17·edited Jun 17

What do you know about sharia law? Women are mere property, a field a man can spread his seed on. It gets much worse. My mother lived in a military styled compound in Da’Haran, Saudi Arabia for several years with the western families. If they left the compound without a head to toe Burqua , they would be raped on sight. If they tried to drive a car, they would be arrested and beaten. By the sharia religious police.

Now go back and read the passages from Ephesians. What does God command the husband to do? Seems like you are brainwashed, just as the author of this piece is describing.

Expand full comment

Women are NOT hardwired to love men, as the past 50 years of Total Feminism has proven conclusively. MEN are hardwired (created) to love and protect women. Women are hardwired to love infants, small children, and animals.

Women were created as HELPERS to the man -- not as his 'equal', not as his better, not as his 24/7 Hall Monitor and Judge. The manipulation of the inceptive urge in men to love women has led directly to the ruination of Western Civilization, and to the downfall of the U.S., Home Hive of the NWO. The New Woman Order.

Two things brought this planet into destruction, despair, and ruination: the desire of the female to have power over the male (and by extension, to have power over God the FATHER) and the failure of the male to restrict the female desire for 'liberation' and 'equality' and 'progress', and instead to Play the Hero by funding, enabling, and enforcing Total Feminism. These are, and were, all lies designed to annihilate your father-led families, dis-spirit you, and steal your wealth, power and freedom.

Janice Fiamengo has been at this a long time, though I have been at it longer. The Number One problem before the nation is not who is elected president -- shuck 'n jive -- but whether you can stop totalitarianism and slavery gradually being forced upon you via the collective power of women. And that tyranny was only possible when enough women had collective power to move the nation radically to the Left over a mere fifty years.

Women love having power and authority over men, though it is rebellion against God and devastation of societies and cultures. And men -- in general -- are too cowardly, weak and emasculated to stop them. Men have learned over the past century to go along with whatever women say, or else. Both the courts and LE have been on-board with the feminist program for four decades. Men are (quietly) fleeing from the Woke-Fem cultures of the anglo nations, and are turning their backs on nations that hate and persecute them. while chastising them for 'privilege' and 'toxicity'.

You can retain feminism and P.C. and your nations will fail and fall, soon. Or you can reject the brainwashing of the past century, and you may yet save and restore your nation. Suit yourselves.

Expand full comment

Wow great wisdom, thanks for writing into this thread.

I am learning how well, when a respectful matriarchy works, the warriors, the protectors, the matriarchs, who, in their rightful place with their multidimensional wisdoms are at work for the greater good, works super well in Natural Law societies.

This is currently developing as we speak with the International Laws recognizing the North American Hereditary as the rightful claim holders of the Lands.

The matriarchs, mostly displaced or destroyed thru the Man War Machinery and the Trans-Atlantic controls, is slowly rebuilding.

Matriarchy worked in the past, with the concepts of spiritual connection as its primary element, something long lost in the worlds of divide and conquer.

Now in saying this, I am also saying each of us carry varying degrees of the Masculine and the Feminine Archetypal energies, no matter what sex we are born with.

And one concept I haven't dived into yet, was what one of my Hereditary Headsmen friends (Chief) said - I had it wrong, the women are actually the warriors, this actually makes sense, for who better be the 'protector' in spirit than a mother.

These are just words we can get hung up on... their origins are somewhat differing in each cultural language. When did the fighter protector, develop? The one who was only deemed necessary in a world where war is the primary focus. AND, who are we to dictate who goes to the battlefield? There is a role for the masculine/feminine in all roles we need to accomplish any task or we risk leaving out the multi-dimensionality approach.

There is much much we don't know about cultural balances, only what we are experiencing now, where the warrior is depicted as the man, the war machine and it doesn't seem to work.

So I do ponder instead of what are the influences on a society, versus a natural cultural world where the functionality of power either exists, or not, but the spiritual aspects of functionality for the greater good and protection of the whole develop the masculine and feminine roles.

I'm looking forward to hopefully seeing this returning shift toward matriarchy for the planet, not just North America.

Expand full comment
Jun 17·edited Jun 17

No need to descend to Karl Jung’s archetype psychobabble.

Women will never protect society from evil, true evil. It takes a man to lead an army or a platoon to charge a hill in combat. Or to lead a SWAT team in a firefight in hand to hand combat. Women will get raped and killed pretty fast in any true exchange of force. It takes a man to be a Commander in Chief. Women are not qualified for that post. It has been like this for the entirety of human history for many thousands of years. Therefore, no woman is qualified to be our President or Vice President.

Expand full comment

There are many ways to view matriarchy, certainly leaders aren't the doers.

I do definitely agree with you... in this war world we live in... but in the development towards peace we all (at least I hope we all) dream about will come from a genteel leadership.

That what I just said, also makes me think that I also know there are those who thrive in a battlefield and that warrior energy... perhaps this is your world? In any case I am grateful for protection when it is needed. However, I would never give up peace for it.

We have differing views - and I see no good in the current system of a 'government' that hasn't ties to evil energies - we need a reset alright!

Jung was an archetypal psychobabler? Had no idea - however if one wants to get hung up on differing perspectives... that is where babble dwells.

So Matriarchy is what I feel will shift the world into a spiritually enlightened humanity toward peace.

I'm sure you may wish to retort - but that is just a game in the bigger world of energetic influences. You know, like the forces of Mother Nature, one has nothing to compare to her strength.

Expand full comment
Jun 18·edited Jun 18

Matriarchy is a cruel joke. There is only one God and no other, YHWH. There are no goddesses. When the Viking marches in, he will first rape you, then kill all the men, then make slaves of your male and female children, then burn your false temple to Ishtar and Gaia, then burn down your house. All your girls will become sex slaves in the harem. All your boys will be castrated and then forced into the army to fight or the harem so they can not impregnate the sex slaves there. Please grow up. Women need men to protect them from evil. American men used to do that in our country until the femenazis took control. Some of us old fashioned Christian men still do this. This what? Protect our women and children from danger. Why? We love them and can’t live without them. We will live with them for eternity in heaven, together. We love all the men, women, and children in our little church. We all want some of our grandchildren to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ all over the earth. Perhaps your local tranny will protect you in his tutu and multicolored hair and fairy suit. Watch out, his face spikes might poke out your eyeball.

America needs far many more Christian masculine men who act like men and disregard all the femenist nonsense completely.

And by the way, exchange the word Viking with Islamic Jihadist. This will happen soon in Western Europe. Why do you think they are panicking now?

Expand full comment

Bravo. This truth is so rarely, rarely spoken. And no wonder, in nations that long ago were conquered by Feminism and Globo-Woke.

Women, vastly empowered and privileged, refuse to hear the truth. While U.S. men are too neutered, cowardly, and fat from material comforts to dare to touch this Third Rail of life in New Amerika.

Expand full comment

phew, I guess you can't actually hear me - I am after all in agreement when it comes to war!

I agree with you of the physical strength differences and the protection mode of a warrior. I do.

What I do believe also and don't feel you are hearing is that women, matriarchy - a true one that isn't infiltrated by Young Leaders with sidewards ambitions, could lead a society away from the need to be war like.

They are not the ones standing in front of the men on a battlefield -- not too many Joan of Arc's around these days, but there are a few... so many more soon with transhumanism perhaps.

But I think my picture of how I see a matriarchy is not what you can even conceive. Perhaps you are just soooo oriented towards war?

Perhaps this is what we have to go through to have our 'great reset'

maybe it is going through the worst imaginable that brings out the best in people?

I think there is a better way... but history keeps repeating with wars, herstory could be different.

Expand full comment
Jun 18·edited Jun 18

I guess we can agree to disagree, calmly.

There is no matriarchy, period.

The natural order of human beings in all time is that societies are led by men because they can enforce the laws with violence if necessary. Almost all normal men do not want violence because they will be ordered to war. Many men believe the highest aspirations for our women, is to be mothers and wives and sisters and grandmothers. Children are our future. Only biological women can do that. This is how YHWH made us. Wives and children need their husbands to protect them and provide for their physical needs for food, shelter, water, and energy, clothing, and all of it, etc….

Expand full comment
Jun 18·edited Jun 18

Human beings love war, they always have and always will. Normal men do not wish to start useless wars that only protect Europe with the blood, treasure, and body bags of our American children. Just because some multiple billionaire gets more Ducats to toss up to the top of his pile and visit Davos every winter to plot our deaths and destruction.

There will not be a matriarchal reset. That’s how you turn a peaceful man into a Viking. Joan of Arc was a myth. I hear you perfectly clearly. I am saying you are just plain wrong and delusional with this line of thinking.

This is scripture in several places. “No one is good, no, not one”. With one exception YHWH the Son, fully man and fully God. History repeats with wars because the hearts of men are evil and desperately wicked. Not all men. It doesn’t take a lot of evil men to destroy society and a nation. This is why women like you need strong masculine good men to fight to protect you and your family. Our military is now trying to put our young soldiers in dresses and mutilate their genitals. Why? Who dreamed this insanity? A femenazi woman.

Expand full comment

Mother Nature is a crazy hag. She thinks she's so large 'n in-charge. She will learn different before this is all over.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment

A man is the head of his family as Christ is the head of his church. Patriarchy is the natural order of the world.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18·edited Jun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

LOL! Say the very people who have FORCED total feminism and totalitarian P.C. on us for fifty years.

But . . . but that's ok, y'see. It's ok when you coerce us. Because you are on the Right Side of History! :O)

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 19·edited Jun 19
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Jun 18·edited Jun 18

You expressed your views. I expressed my views. We should agree to disagree. My views are 4000 years old. Feminists are trying to enforce their pagan views across society. Native Americans had no matriarchal society. Ever hear about Iroquois Nation? Or Aztecs? Or Blackfeet nation? They conquered other Indian nations, took slaves, killed the opposing men of the other tribes. Not so much Kumbaya. People are people in all cultures. Matriarchy projects weakness and invites invasion of more powerful Patriarchal conquistadors.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 19·edited Jun 19
Comment removed
Expand full comment

One only can hope that the multidimensional capacities start opening up for more people... those who are robotically attuned to indoctrination are also those I would classify as in a box... Matt Ehret calls it the 'closed system' where only the defined boundaries are acceptable from data collection to how diverse one's community is. VS the open system of creative possibilities - these are people who are learned in the process of thinking... https://canadianpatriot.org/2022/08/28/biogeochemistry-and-open-system-thinking-with-vladimir-vernadsky/

Expand full comment

"Slavery gradually being forced on you via the collective power of women"?and "tyranny was only possible when enough women had collective power to move the nation radically to the left over a mere fifty years"? What planet are you on? The slavery that is happening right now en masse, worldwide, is human trafficking be it for sex, organ transplants, labor, etc. and you are going to say that women are behind it? Really? All this paedophilia going on behind closed doors of government, religious institutions, corporations, are women? Who are the ones that have built all the DUMBS over the last 50yrs? Who has built this into the largest GNP worldwide? You have lost the thread as they say. There's a much bigger picture going on here.

Expand full comment

S.H.R. Standard Hysterical Reaction to the truth.

You address none of my points, but instead seek to distract immediately via the most emotional trigger-point you could find: human trafficking.

D.C. relies on exactly the same tactic, tho usually accompanied by a personal attack on the character of the Offender.

Expand full comment

I exactly addressed your retarded points. Your reading comprehension is nil. And you failed to answer not one of my questions, fool.

Expand full comment

You would not call me a fool to my face, and you know it. And that is the problem with New Amerika. Punk thugettes like you who spew their lies and malice without consequence.

I will be seeing you down the road, mouthy.

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 17·edited Jun 17
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Comes down to the root programs you speak of:

Want for safety and security (what they advertised the covid shots were all about) false narrative apparently!

Want for control - some women in the political world are as domineering as men in that roll and even more vicious (Hilary) some are more spiritual (Marianne Williamson)

Want for Love and Approval - acceptance and soothing the ego

Want for Oneness - community and belongingness which has elements of them all...

But to want Freedom more than all these programs we've been imprinted with either by parenting or indoctrination, to want freedom more, IS Risky. It means self responsibility, self reliance, and self resiliency... most are taught to lean into the government for most of these things.

We would do well to bring back an education that taught these 3 most required elements for obtaining our Freedoms.

Expand full comment

Nothing that Janice said, or that Elizabeth wrote, even was considered by you and your feminist friends here. And that, indeed, sums up the vile post-feminist nation you love so dearly. Faced with reality and the truth, you plug your ears and return to the vomit of your feminist cant about how The Evil Patriarchy oppressed women, and now it's Your Turn.

Lies. Attractive and yummy lies. As if The Evil Patriarchy (or men in general) EVER sought to destroy the human family, make endless war on men, little boys, and masculinity in general, and turn every societal institution into a resentment-drenched, mega-empowered feminist weapon against maleness.

You and your sisters will not be satisfied until all is in ruin around you, at which point you will STILL be looking around for some man or boy on whom to blame your selfishness, deceit, malevolence, and power-lust. May you reap double as you have sown.

Expand full comment

Michael, I'm sad for you to feel this way, its showing how poorly you've been treated by women. May you some day find someone in your path with the true caring touch and loving hands of a truly genuinely nice woman.

Expand full comment

yawn yawn same lame rap from every fembot the past three loooong decades: Oh! I'm SO sorry for you! [fake sympathy] you must hate women/live in your mother's basement/be an incel/strangle baby ducks/fill-in-the-shaming-blank.

You don't get it prissy missy. I am WAY beyond your passive-aggressive attacks. My life has been full of good relationships with women. Your assumption otherwise, and your attempt to weaponize same, reveals the malice of your shriveled heart, and that of your demonic movement of 'liberation'.

It is you who is an object of pity. The true tragedy (for everybody, yourself included) is that you are legion by the tens-of-millions, and you are in charge. My bossy little missy! lol

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Does anything EVER exit your mouth that is not an accusation?

Expand full comment
RemovedJun 18·edited Jun 18
Comment removed
Expand full comment

I am well aware of forces dividing-and-conquering the dualities of this world. Far more aware than you. But whether male or female, you are a feminist.

You accuse just like a fembot. I won't go along with your childish men-had-their-turn and now it's womens' turn, and anybody not going along with that must FEAR WOMEN.

Like all fembots, you assume that any nation not genuflecting to your beloved Feminism and its fake Equality For Some is 'backward'. It is YOU and your feminist nation that are 'backward' . . . so backward you have completely inverted God's divine order, and nature's order, to inflict upon the world the fem-supremacist ideology you claim represents 'equality'.

Females did it because they covet power, rule over men, and unearned wealth. Males did it because they are self-deluding cowards and geldings.

Indeed, you claim like every fem-fascist that equality between men and women is 'innate'. Were you born yesterday? Do you still not understand the vast differences between female and male nature? Any man strong enough to reject the lies you gladly gobble down about 'innate equality' between male and female must . . . fear women.

Riiight. Now we're back on good ole familiar fem-turf! False accusations are your daily bread. Because that's EXACTLY the same jive from feminists I have heard the past four decades . . . oh, you won't go along with our fem-first 'equality' program? . . . well then you must FEAR AND HATE WOMEN. A misogynist. A hater. Lives in mommy's basement. Ad infinitum.

That is the argumentation of an ideological thug and coward, and I hate and make war on ideological thugs. Male or female. How's that for Equality?

You understand the truth but like the rest of modern Amerikans, you don't have the integrity nor the sand to face it. So you find subtle ways of accusing and demeaning those who do.

Expand full comment

I was given a piece of advice about marriage in my early twenties: if each of you does 100% you’ll do great. My wife and I have known each other for 40 years, recently celebrated our 37th anniversary, and followed that dictum. We’ve had our share of financial and health challenges, which is what it is, but overall we’re very happy.

Expand full comment

Us too. We just had our 44th anniversary and still love each other, warts and all.

Expand full comment

Congratulations!!!

Expand full comment

I am a parent of both now-adult boys and girls. Among their female friends, and one of mine, who are 40-ish, I've heard interesting tales.

One, upon being told in college that she was repressed, argued that she wasn't. She was then told by the female instructor that she was too repressed to know how repressed she was! (Non-minority Canadian).

Another, who'd grown up in a large homeschooling, Catholic family, made it into the PhD realm. On being told, in Women's Studies, how badly women were repressed in the Middle Ages, aptly pointed out that MOST people in the Middle Ages were "repressed". She has since paused her studies to marry and start a family.

Another PhD gal I know is now happily married and raising a family.

It is happening. It should be supported. Wasn't feminism about "choice"?

Expand full comment

It claimed to be about 'choice,' but in reality it was about coercion. It was only 'choice' if you made approved choices.

"I didn't burn my bra so you could go home and have kids!!"

Expand full comment

Exactly

Expand full comment
founding
Jun 18Liked by elizabeth nickson

Fascinating conversation which resonates on many levels. For what it is worth, I would do the dishes (and do) every day if it spared me the agony of grocery shopping and errands.

Expand full comment

Things I find entertaining:

1. All mammal species have “gender roles.”

2. Women believing evolutionary gender roles selected for over millions of years (yes, the primates from which we descended had/have gender roles), suddenly can be ignored/rejected because a few women decided a century ago that they didn’t like them. LOL.

Expand full comment

Thank you… Excellent piece. I am usually scared away from long discussions and interviews. But this one captivated me.

I think it shows that there is great hope before us. These small fires will continue to spread and these truths will become irresistible! Inspite of the feminist madness going on. We see the ultimate completion of this madness in our federal government want to draft women into the military.

Go Georgia! Go Hungary!

And may God strengthen women to resist feminism!

Expand full comment