Because millions of their future wives, sisters, cousins and schoolmates have been brutally raped, their vaginas shredded with knives, infected with multiple diseases by Muslim gangs.
And these Paki rape gangs are seemingly only viable in a Western socialist society that promises to take care of them from cradle to grave. Affirmative Action, which morphed into DEI, really set the stage for value placed on identity rather than ability to execute. And at the same time, put the last three generations of innocent straight white males at the back of the line for every opportunity; punished solely because of their race, gender and sexual preference.
Four of my brothers and i are Catholic US military veterans and will never stop fighting for American independence and freedom from oppression; foreign or domestic.
Race has nothing to do with it. Islam means submission. Islam is a deen, a way of life, a legal-socio-political-economic system that seeks to undermine and replace constitutional forms of government. Islamic organizations should be subject to the same laws as other such organisations. (Not exempted due to “religion”).
There I went, thinking Islam was the root issue, but all the time it was the Jews fault! I see it now. Mohammed was Jewish. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 People are jumping out of their skins over the Jews. A tub full of bollocks that only serves to discredit the honest identification of the Islam problem. Thank you very much.
So when the Muslims invaded India over 1000 years ago and turned what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslim, and wiped out Buddhism in the HOME OF BUDDHISM, that was the Jews?
Similarly, every early conquest of Islam was the Jews?
This claim requires careful examination, because it mixes some historical context with significant inaccuracies and presents a contested narrative as established "FACT." Let me break it down:
The origin of the claim
The story that Jews opened the gates of Toledo to Muslim invaders originates primarily from medieval Christian chronicles, not from contemporary 8th-century sources. No surviving Muslim or Visigothic account from the period of the conquest (711 CE) documents this event. The narrative appears in later Christian writings and was subsequently repeated by some historians, including the prominent Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz and Salo Baron, who argued that given the brutal persecution of Jews under late Visigothic rulers (particularly King Egica, r. 687–702, who issued severe anti-Jewish decrees including forced conversions), it was plausible that some Jewish communities welcomed or even assisted the conquerors.
However, modern scholars increasingly treat this narrative with significant skepticism. As noted in scholarship published through sources like JSTOR and eScholarship (University of California), the "gates of Toledo" story is viewed as a polemical trope — one that served various political and theological purposes for those who recorded it later. The lack of contemporary corroboration is a major problem for treating it as fact.
Additional problems with the claim as stated:
-Toledo in 711: The Umayyad conquest led by Tariq ibn Ziyad in 711 was a gradual process. Toledo did not fall immediately upon the initial invasion. Presenting this as a single dramatic event where "Jews opened the gates" in 711 oversimplifies a complex, multi-year military campaign.
-"Conquest of Spain for 800 years": This is a rough approximation that obscures enormous complexity. Muslim presence in Iberia lasted roughly until 1492 (the fall of Granada), but Muslim-controlled territory shrank dramatically over the centuries. After the collapse of the Caliphate of Córdoba in 1031, al-Andalus fragmented into competing Taifa kingdoms. Large portions of the peninsula were reclaimed by Christian kingdoms centuries before 1492. "800 years of conquest" paints a picture of unified, continuous domination that simply didn't exist.
-"FACT": Perhaps the biggest issue is the framing. Even among historians who find the collaboration narrative plausible given the persecutory context of Visigothic Spain, this is treated as an educated inference, not a documented fact. The distinction matters enormously.
Context that matters
It is well-documented that Jews in Visigothic Spain faced severe persecution — forced conversions, confiscation of property, enslavement, and bans on religious practice under several kings, culminating in the draconian 17th Council of Toledo (694 CE). It is entirely reasonable to infer that Jewish communities would not have mourned the fall of their persecutors. Some historians argue that the Muslim conquerors may have garrisoned conquered cities with Jewish or Berber troops, given their relative shortage of manpower. But inferring sympathy or opportunistic collaboration from documented persecution is different from claiming that Jews "opened the gates of Toledo" as a specific, verified event.
Bottom line: This post takes a debated, likely apocryphal medieval narrative and presents it as undeniable fact while flattening centuries of Iberian history into a simplistic and misleading summary. It's the kind of claim that can function as an antisemitic talking point precisely because it strips away nuance and presents a contested story as established truth. The more honest historical picture is that late Visigothic persecution of Jews was real and severe, that this created conditions where some collaboration was plausible, but that the specific "gates of Toledo" story lacks contemporary sourcing and is regarded with skepticism by modern historians.
I'll admit, Jews are an extra special kind of high IQ stupid. They are smart enough to excel at medicine law and all kinds of positions of influence, but stupid enough to think that bringing in the 3rd world - including Muslim hordes - will make life easier for them.
A few are starting to wake up, but it seems that the majority are still stuck with the idea that they will be safer in countries where they are just one of many minorities. You would THINK it would only take a few targeted attacks by Muslims on Jews in Western countries to be disabused of that idea, but no.
Or perhaps they could read what the Koran says about Jews, and get the idea that Muslims that shout "Allahu Akbar" as they kill infidels (Jews first and foremost) really are just being good Muslims, but no.
Is there a name for the ability of a person to change their mind if they have been wrong? That should formally be a component of IQ.
Race has a fair amount to do with it. Different races have different IQ's, and people of higher intelligence are more likely to realize Islam is a horrible religion, and find ways to resist it.
“People of higher intelligence… Islam” is not borne out by the facts at so many colleges, and intelligence is not an element of common sense. I think people of lower intellectual capacity can understand when they are forced to submit. In any case, the point I am making is that it is Islam and its insidious foray into western society that is the issue that must be and can be tackled irrespective of the race of the peoples following it. Race, by all means, should be noted, but our spear is more effective when pointed at the true enemy of the West, Islam.
I just saw a post that seemed to say Islam has nothing to do with intelligence. A part of my brain clicked, and I felt compelled to reply.
Historically, when an Islamic nation is invading, the nations that have a better equipped (higher technology) army, leaders that are willing to adapt their techniques to face the current threat, and a populace that understands the threat are going to do much better. All those things correlate with a populace that is higher IQ.
Charles Martel and Vlad 3 "Tepes" of Wallachia are cases in point of leaders that had what it took to turn back Muslims.
On a person-by-person level, Islam is a more corrupting influence than lack of intelligence.
The higher IQ Muslims can generally get jobs and have enough impulse control to not get in as much trouble with the law. Of course that means that more of them can be imported before a society reaches a tipping point, so "immigration" or invasion of higher IQ Muslim people may be a bigger problem.
Thx for reply. Intelligence helps but it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the required resistance, imo. If intelligence is the determiner then why are so many professors and other highly educated citizens all in, ranting free palestine? The red green alliance is real and a real threat. IMO the important thing is to raise awareness about what Islam teaches, to its followers in its mosques and to its children in its schools. It is nothing like what most people today in the West think, especially the AWFLs, and nowhere close to being a peaceful religion. Richard Lionheart got it right. Churchill got it right. There are MPs in UK and some US congressman that get it.
Young men of the west - if you participate in saving your own culture you will hold a semblance of influence that would far surpass the derogation pinned to your fathers, uncles, brothers, friends, for the last 40 years.
While foreign rape gangs spoiled young - fatherless - girls, remember that it was the people, and the deranged womenfolk, of your own culture that looked the other way for decades while all manner of legal and otherwise venom was spitefully brandished your way. Divorce, alimony, pension, custody, employment rape leveled against you in parliament and elsewhere. Do you wish to protect and perpetuate these blights?
Thank you, Elizabeth for your unflinching coverage of the biggest threat to Western civilization. And thank you for also reminding us of the extraordinary times we are living and that: "It’s going to be fantastic" We need to hear that and to embrace our roles in these times. ~ Ginger Breggin
Murray wrote "The Bell Curve" about traits and DNA. He was vilified. He said we should focus on total human traits vs IQ which is a narrow measure of 'intelligence'. Leftists are tribal to an extreme. Never see a whole but factions that believe themselves deprived by those with whiter skin tones.
I read the "The Bell Curve" back in the day. The liberals have never been able to disprove anything in it, but did succeed in shutting down all conversation about heritability of IQ, and especially the differences in average IQ between races.
That dam seems to have broken with the Somali fraud scandal, at least in the online circles I'm in. Prior to that, people only spoke about racial IQ differences anonymously, in comment sections on websites like zerohedge. Now it's spoken of quite a bit more openly, maybe not on Bluesky, but at least in center-right forums.
Facts have a way of emerging despite those who try to bury them. A wider discussion of IQ should show it is culturally sensitive. Some groups score higher which are more deeply aligned with an educational culture. A culture not so focused misses teaching IQ sensitive responses but other qualities reign. IQ is an eugenist's construction forced into our educational system. The use of IQ treats individuals as machines measurable by the same narrow basis. We are smart in many ways not measured by IQ in my opinion. Many plumbers solve issues high IQ people fail to grasp.
I have heard people on the left and the right say that something has to be done about young people’s opportunities or they will become radicalized and vote for communists. A big problem for them has been the student debt scam (also houses have become unaffordable, as free loans were being given to illegals and there’s so much grift with our public services). But this cultural problem has to be solved also because otherwise it radicalizes a generation or more.
Conclusion: violence and injustice echo through generations creating more of it.
ps Violent rap music did not come from the grassroots. It was cultural Manipulation
Jeff Childers of Coffee and Covid pointed that out. I imagine he heard that from someone else, though.
It sure would be nice if we had a superbowl halftime show that featured somebody that middle aged or older white people might like. By my reckoning that hasn't happened since 2019.
You have an observation about fair-skinned societies that has some scientific backing about behavior and skin or fur tones. Human domestication leads to reduction of tribal perceptions in favor of social cohesion. As a result we stopped our rampant infighting and established rules-based co-habitation structures. From this evolved the Golden Rule. This is a ChatGPT search for the existence of such a biological association.
From ChatGPT:
There is a deep, documented genetic connection between animal domestication and changes in skin and fur color. [1]
When early humans began domesticating animals, they selectively bred for tameness, which accidentally altered developmental pathways that also control pigmentation. This phenomenon is a well-known component of "Domestication Syndrome". [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Link Between Domestication and Color
Many physical traits associated with pets—such as floppy ears, smaller jaws, and changes in fur color—are tied to the neural crest, a group of embryonic stem cells. During domestication, the selection for a tamer, less reactive animal inadvertently reduces the number or activity of these neural crest cells. Because neural crest cells also form the pigment-producing cells (melanocytes), this reduction often results in spotted, piebald, or lighter coats. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Genes Associated with Fur and Skin Color
Over 150 genes interact to control mammalian skin, hair, and eye color. Several of the primary genes responsible for this variation across domesticated species include: [1, 2, 3]
• MC1R (Melanocortin 1 Receptor): This is one of the most critical genes determining pigment-type switching. When activated, it promotes black/brown pigment; when inhibited, it produces yellow/red pigment. Mutations in this gene are responsible for coat colors in domestic dogs, rabbits, and many other animals. [1, 2]
• ASIP (Agouti Signaling Protein): This gene encodes a protein that signals hair follicle pigment cells to switch back and forth between black/brown and yellow/white pigments. Variations in the ASIP gene account for color differences in dogs, wolves, and other mammals. [1]
• K Locus / CBD 103: A gene that interacts heavily with both MC1R and ASIP to determine whether a dog's coat is predominantly black, brindle, or yellow. [1]
• DKK4: Identified in research on domestic cats, this gene helps regulate the early development of fur patterns. It plays a major role in establishing differences in striping, blotching, and spotting. [1]
• Tyrosinase and TRP genes: Studies on farmed mink (which have been bred into a wide variety of colors over the last century) show that the expression of these pigment-synthesis genes is the primary driver in generating specific coat colors. [1]
Another critical factor is the phase of our evolution when Neanderthals interbred with Homosapiens; they interbred with Asians and whites but not blacks. The higher the amount of Neanderthal DNA in a race, the higher the average IQ score of that race. Order of both is Asians, then whites and last, blacks; a full standard deviation below whites. This is well documented also; just not well publicized.
When a girl is attacked/raped/slashed she finds out within a few days that going to the police is utterly pointless; it literally compounds her trauma & physical pain & revulsion with the attacker, his screeching abrasive voice, his smell, his fellow attackers. Going to the cops makes it literally worse. Plus going to social workers. Does. Not. Help. Going to a law office, ditto. Going to any state functionary, ditto. Can people really acknowledge that our societies are unravelling, that the complex bureaucracy in place has no effect when it impinges on any of the woke DEI sanctum sanctorum?
At 72 I've lived here in Asia since 1998. This Muslim raping of white girls is something I read of, watch interviews about, but clearly it's not part of my daily reality. Being here gives me, I suppose, a bit of objectivity. What hits me is that the victims can't rely, in even the most minimal sense, on state institutions. Its futile for a victim even to report it to the police, or other drone-like authorities. I'm surprised white gangs haven't self-assembled, not to gather evidence or intimidate rapists or other Dirty Harry b.s., but to get far more basic.
This must be part of the general decline of Western countries, blah blah, being exploited by young Muslim men. Such violence accelerates the slow motion cratering of social institutions. It seems obvious that it's gone too far for any institutional clean-up campaign to have any effect. I get the sense that there's a profound society-wide paralysis, especially in Europe. Leftist discourse is absolute gospel across Europe for the upper, upper middle, and even much of the middle class, meaning there's no real will to address this, and the dozens of other metastasizing social problems. Europe's 'solution' seems to be brokering a Big War to bury all violent, criminal social problems under a multi-year genocidal killfest The Left can't change, and doesn't believe there's even a problem, and so isn't willing to address it.
Hopefully we'll avoid war. Putin can see of course that the warmongering West is just projecting its own internal failures in this desire for war. He'll deflect it as long as possible. In the meantime though how to solve the problem of Muslim violence, depravity, irresponsibility? Let's forget about going the mega-deportation route. Too many Constitutional obstacles. Which means either Muslims somehow self-correct so the violence ends, OR Muslims voluntarily self-deport. It becomes their sudden, overwhelming, absolute & total choice: to leave. I seriously think that's the only way this happens.
So how to bring about that change of heart in our vile Muslim guests? Simple. Ordinary white & black & Asian people have to go out of their way, every day, in every way, making daily life for our Muslim guests extremely, relentlessly, supremely unpleasant. Dare I say it this could include huge levels of quite visceral, uh, violence. Oh my.
This is when white gangs could really come into their own. But these won't be the ordinary dysfunctional substance-abusing criminal freak show 'gangs'. They'll be the literal inverse of that! Plus they won't actually be 'white', but that's the term the media will apply. They'll just be 100% willing to make life a living hell for the 'Muslim community'.
I don't care whether they're Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Orthodox, can we just find them and give them the death penalty. These evil creatures need to be put down asap.
Being the sensetive person I am I can not support depriving a miscreatant with his life. However a punishment for rape must be employed. Perhaps make the punishment fit the crime. Cut off his penis and balls as well as his hands......violently.
Hmm.. well, ok, if we don't want to kill people, I guess, permanently cripple is the next best option. Ok, yes, cut of his penis, balls, one whole hand, the other hand we can leave just the thumb and pinky so he can us a spoon to eat.. and also cut off his opposite leg. Then send him to prison to serve his time. When or if he gets back out again, he can wear an ankle monitor for the rest of his life.
Those who believe in the moral equivalence of all cultures cannot fathom the notion that some cultures and particularly one that is driven by a supremacy (the "one true god") doctrine and honor bound duty to implement their theocracy (Shariah) wherever they live, is incompatible with a liberal western society that is now in Stockholm syndrome to all other cultures as they self-flagellate about their own mistaught or forgotten culture. Moral cowardice of all western governments deflects to "extremism" or "terrorism" (purity and a tactic) as the problems. The knights Templar holding Castles in Spain did more to protect western civilization than any electable politician of today seeking the votes of Muslims or belonging to a Party that does. The west can either rediscover the values of western civilization and stand up to Islam or the future is eventually Islam. Peaceful reconciliation is the least likely outcome. In the UK, civil war is no longer unimaginable.
I believe that Jesus Christ is the one true God but I also believe God gives us the freedom to make choices and that it is not government or religions right to force a religious belief or choice on individuals.
So, without doubt, it was black Americans who swung Georgia, the PRESIDENT'S way. White suburbanites are the major block to the PRESIDENT. Do you agree
It gives me a measure of hope when there appears to be so little.
Here in the UK we're stuck with a left-wing Labour government, and are faced with either another 3 years - when the first 2 have been bad enough, as bad as the Biden administration and potentially worse because our governments have 5 year terms - or another 5 if they call an early election and win due to the bounce in popularity after Starmer finally resigned. I'm astonished and despair at how easily fooled some of the public are. Labour can change its leader but its policies remain the same, and they're ruinous.
The anger in the UK is building, but a coherent cohesive opposition to the Marxists hasn't coalesced into one winning party that can win an election outright. And meanwhile, the UK is circling the drain, and the boats full of illegal migrants keep coming and coming and the government does nothing.
And the legal migrants from countries with incompatible cultures also keep coming....
I agree with what you are saying, but don't pretend you are the "only voice". Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson are the people with the biggest reach that are spreading the word.
And I put out a substack a little while ago that was largely based on someone else's article about the rape gangs.
Indeed. Tommy has been campaigning about it for years, and has served time in prison because of an Establishment that wants him to shut up, or preferably, die.
Thank you! I’m English and worked for 20 years in child protection! The rape and torture is so much worse than anyone could imagine!
And these Paki rape gangs are seemingly only viable in a Western socialist society that promises to take care of them from cradle to grave. Affirmative Action, which morphed into DEI, really set the stage for value placed on identity rather than ability to execute. And at the same time, put the last three generations of innocent straight white males at the back of the line for every opportunity; punished solely because of their race, gender and sexual preference.
Four of my brothers and i are Catholic US military veterans and will never stop fighting for American independence and freedom from oppression; foreign or domestic.
Race has nothing to do with it. Islam means submission. Islam is a deen, a way of life, a legal-socio-political-economic system that seeks to undermine and replace constitutional forms of government. Islamic organizations should be subject to the same laws as other such organisations. (Not exempted due to “religion”).
See also
https://perspectivesonislam.substack.com/p/islam-its-not-about-ethnicity
Race has everything to do with it.
Muslims and Africans are being used as jews bio-weapons to miscegenate white nations out of existance.
Go on call me a racist.
There I went, thinking Islam was the root issue, but all the time it was the Jews fault! I see it now. Mohammed was Jewish. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 People are jumping out of their skins over the Jews. A tub full of bollocks that only serves to discredit the honest identification of the Islam problem. Thank you very much.
So when the Muslims invaded India over 1000 years ago and turned what is now Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslim, and wiped out Buddhism in the HOME OF BUDDHISM, that was the Jews?
Similarly, every early conquest of Islam was the Jews?
FACT. Jews opened the gates of the capital city Toledo in Spain in 711 which allowed the conquest of Spain for 800 years.
You’re welcome (courtesy of Lumo):
This claim requires careful examination, because it mixes some historical context with significant inaccuracies and presents a contested narrative as established "FACT." Let me break it down:
The origin of the claim
The story that Jews opened the gates of Toledo to Muslim invaders originates primarily from medieval Christian chronicles, not from contemporary 8th-century sources. No surviving Muslim or Visigothic account from the period of the conquest (711 CE) documents this event. The narrative appears in later Christian writings and was subsequently repeated by some historians, including the prominent Jewish historian Heinrich Graetz and Salo Baron, who argued that given the brutal persecution of Jews under late Visigothic rulers (particularly King Egica, r. 687–702, who issued severe anti-Jewish decrees including forced conversions), it was plausible that some Jewish communities welcomed or even assisted the conquerors.
However, modern scholars increasingly treat this narrative with significant skepticism. As noted in scholarship published through sources like JSTOR and eScholarship (University of California), the "gates of Toledo" story is viewed as a polemical trope — one that served various political and theological purposes for those who recorded it later. The lack of contemporary corroboration is a major problem for treating it as fact.
Additional problems with the claim as stated:
-Toledo in 711: The Umayyad conquest led by Tariq ibn Ziyad in 711 was a gradual process. Toledo did not fall immediately upon the initial invasion. Presenting this as a single dramatic event where "Jews opened the gates" in 711 oversimplifies a complex, multi-year military campaign.
-"Conquest of Spain for 800 years": This is a rough approximation that obscures enormous complexity. Muslim presence in Iberia lasted roughly until 1492 (the fall of Granada), but Muslim-controlled territory shrank dramatically over the centuries. After the collapse of the Caliphate of Córdoba in 1031, al-Andalus fragmented into competing Taifa kingdoms. Large portions of the peninsula were reclaimed by Christian kingdoms centuries before 1492. "800 years of conquest" paints a picture of unified, continuous domination that simply didn't exist.
-"FACT": Perhaps the biggest issue is the framing. Even among historians who find the collaboration narrative plausible given the persecutory context of Visigothic Spain, this is treated as an educated inference, not a documented fact. The distinction matters enormously.
Context that matters
It is well-documented that Jews in Visigothic Spain faced severe persecution — forced conversions, confiscation of property, enslavement, and bans on religious practice under several kings, culminating in the draconian 17th Council of Toledo (694 CE). It is entirely reasonable to infer that Jewish communities would not have mourned the fall of their persecutors. Some historians argue that the Muslim conquerors may have garrisoned conquered cities with Jewish or Berber troops, given their relative shortage of manpower. But inferring sympathy or opportunistic collaboration from documented persecution is different from claiming that Jews "opened the gates of Toledo" as a specific, verified event.
Bottom line: This post takes a debated, likely apocryphal medieval narrative and presents it as undeniable fact while flattening centuries of Iberian history into a simplistic and misleading summary. It's the kind of claim that can function as an antisemitic talking point precisely because it strips away nuance and presents a contested story as established truth. The more honest historical picture is that late Visigothic persecution of Jews was real and severe, that this created conditions where some collaboration was plausible, but that the specific "gates of Toledo" story lacks contemporary sourcing and is regarded with skepticism by modern historians.
Always nice to hear from someone who has studied a controversial issue and willing to spend the time to teach those less well informed - - -
Who and what are you refering to?
Source for your claims?
Lumo
I'll admit, Jews are an extra special kind of high IQ stupid. They are smart enough to excel at medicine law and all kinds of positions of influence, but stupid enough to think that bringing in the 3rd world - including Muslim hordes - will make life easier for them.
A few are starting to wake up, but it seems that the majority are still stuck with the idea that they will be safer in countries where they are just one of many minorities. You would THINK it would only take a few targeted attacks by Muslims on Jews in Western countries to be disabused of that idea, but no.
Or perhaps they could read what the Koran says about Jews, and get the idea that Muslims that shout "Allahu Akbar" as they kill infidels (Jews first and foremost) really are just being good Muslims, but no.
Is there a name for the ability of a person to change their mind if they have been wrong? That should formally be a component of IQ.
Open mindedness?
You can pretty much replace the word Jew with Christian or white or non-Muslim citizen of the West and it would be true.
Race has a fair amount to do with it. Different races have different IQ's, and people of higher intelligence are more likely to realize Islam is a horrible religion, and find ways to resist it.
“People of higher intelligence… Islam” is not borne out by the facts at so many colleges, and intelligence is not an element of common sense. I think people of lower intellectual capacity can understand when they are forced to submit. In any case, the point I am making is that it is Islam and its insidious foray into western society that is the issue that must be and can be tackled irrespective of the race of the peoples following it. Race, by all means, should be noted, but our spear is more effective when pointed at the true enemy of the West, Islam.
I just saw a post that seemed to say Islam has nothing to do with intelligence. A part of my brain clicked, and I felt compelled to reply.
Historically, when an Islamic nation is invading, the nations that have a better equipped (higher technology) army, leaders that are willing to adapt their techniques to face the current threat, and a populace that understands the threat are going to do much better. All those things correlate with a populace that is higher IQ.
Charles Martel and Vlad 3 "Tepes" of Wallachia are cases in point of leaders that had what it took to turn back Muslims.
On a person-by-person level, Islam is a more corrupting influence than lack of intelligence.
The higher IQ Muslims can generally get jobs and have enough impulse control to not get in as much trouble with the law. Of course that means that more of them can be imported before a society reaches a tipping point, so "immigration" or invasion of higher IQ Muslim people may be a bigger problem.
BTW that book in your profile pic should be required reading in all US high schools!
Thx for reply. Intelligence helps but it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the required resistance, imo. If intelligence is the determiner then why are so many professors and other highly educated citizens all in, ranting free palestine? The red green alliance is real and a real threat. IMO the important thing is to raise awareness about what Islam teaches, to its followers in its mosques and to its children in its schools. It is nothing like what most people today in the West think, especially the AWFLs, and nowhere close to being a peaceful religion. Richard Lionheart got it right. Churchill got it right. There are MPs in UK and some US congressman that get it.
Young men of the west - if you participate in saving your own culture you will hold a semblance of influence that would far surpass the derogation pinned to your fathers, uncles, brothers, friends, for the last 40 years.
While foreign rape gangs spoiled young - fatherless - girls, remember that it was the people, and the deranged womenfolk, of your own culture that looked the other way for decades while all manner of legal and otherwise venom was spitefully brandished your way. Divorce, alimony, pension, custody, employment rape leveled against you in parliament and elsewhere. Do you wish to protect and perpetuate these blights?
Thank you, Elizabeth for your unflinching coverage of the biggest threat to Western civilization. And thank you for also reminding us of the extraordinary times we are living and that: "It’s going to be fantastic" We need to hear that and to embrace our roles in these times. ~ Ginger Breggin
Murray wrote "The Bell Curve" about traits and DNA. He was vilified. He said we should focus on total human traits vs IQ which is a narrow measure of 'intelligence'. Leftists are tribal to an extreme. Never see a whole but factions that believe themselves deprived by those with whiter skin tones.
I read the "The Bell Curve" back in the day. The liberals have never been able to disprove anything in it, but did succeed in shutting down all conversation about heritability of IQ, and especially the differences in average IQ between races.
That dam seems to have broken with the Somali fraud scandal, at least in the online circles I'm in. Prior to that, people only spoke about racial IQ differences anonymously, in comment sections on websites like zerohedge. Now it's spoken of quite a bit more openly, maybe not on Bluesky, but at least in center-right forums.
Facts have a way of emerging despite those who try to bury them. A wider discussion of IQ should show it is culturally sensitive. Some groups score higher which are more deeply aligned with an educational culture. A culture not so focused misses teaching IQ sensitive responses but other qualities reign. IQ is an eugenist's construction forced into our educational system. The use of IQ treats individuals as machines measurable by the same narrow basis. We are smart in many ways not measured by IQ in my opinion. Many plumbers solve issues high IQ people fail to grasp.
From the River to the Sea make the World Islam Free!! ♥️🇺🇲
I have heard people on the left and the right say that something has to be done about young people’s opportunities or they will become radicalized and vote for communists. A big problem for them has been the student debt scam (also houses have become unaffordable, as free loans were being given to illegals and there’s so much grift with our public services). But this cultural problem has to be solved also because otherwise it radicalizes a generation or more.
Conclusion: violence and injustice echo through generations creating more of it.
ps Violent rap music did not come from the grassroots. It was cultural Manipulation
I recently read that not one rap song or artist was leading the charts anymore for the first time in decades, after the USAID money dried up.
Jeff Childers of Coffee and Covid pointed that out. I imagine he heard that from someone else, though.
It sure would be nice if we had a superbowl halftime show that featured somebody that middle aged or older white people might like. By my reckoning that hasn't happened since 2019.
Very interesting!
You have an observation about fair-skinned societies that has some scientific backing about behavior and skin or fur tones. Human domestication leads to reduction of tribal perceptions in favor of social cohesion. As a result we stopped our rampant infighting and established rules-based co-habitation structures. From this evolved the Golden Rule. This is a ChatGPT search for the existence of such a biological association.
From ChatGPT:
There is a deep, documented genetic connection between animal domestication and changes in skin and fur color. [1]
When early humans began domesticating animals, they selectively bred for tameness, which accidentally altered developmental pathways that also control pigmentation. This phenomenon is a well-known component of "Domestication Syndrome". [1, 2, 3, 4]
The Link Between Domestication and Color
Many physical traits associated with pets—such as floppy ears, smaller jaws, and changes in fur color—are tied to the neural crest, a group of embryonic stem cells. During domestication, the selection for a tamer, less reactive animal inadvertently reduces the number or activity of these neural crest cells. Because neural crest cells also form the pigment-producing cells (melanocytes), this reduction often results in spotted, piebald, or lighter coats. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Key Genes Associated with Fur and Skin Color
Over 150 genes interact to control mammalian skin, hair, and eye color. Several of the primary genes responsible for this variation across domesticated species include: [1, 2, 3]
• MC1R (Melanocortin 1 Receptor): This is one of the most critical genes determining pigment-type switching. When activated, it promotes black/brown pigment; when inhibited, it produces yellow/red pigment. Mutations in this gene are responsible for coat colors in domestic dogs, rabbits, and many other animals. [1, 2]
• ASIP (Agouti Signaling Protein): This gene encodes a protein that signals hair follicle pigment cells to switch back and forth between black/brown and yellow/white pigments. Variations in the ASIP gene account for color differences in dogs, wolves, and other mammals. [1]
• K Locus / CBD 103: A gene that interacts heavily with both MC1R and ASIP to determine whether a dog's coat is predominantly black, brindle, or yellow. [1]
• DKK4: Identified in research on domestic cats, this gene helps regulate the early development of fur patterns. It plays a major role in establishing differences in striping, blotching, and spotting. [1]
• Tyrosinase and TRP genes: Studies on farmed mink (which have been bred into a wide variety of colors over the last century) show that the expression of these pigment-synthesis genes is the primary driver in generating specific coat colors. [1]
Another critical factor is the phase of our evolution when Neanderthals interbred with Homosapiens; they interbred with Asians and whites but not blacks. The higher the amount of Neanderthal DNA in a race, the higher the average IQ score of that race. Order of both is Asians, then whites and last, blacks; a full standard deviation below whites. This is well documented also; just not well publicized.
When a girl is attacked/raped/slashed she finds out within a few days that going to the police is utterly pointless; it literally compounds her trauma & physical pain & revulsion with the attacker, his screeching abrasive voice, his smell, his fellow attackers. Going to the cops makes it literally worse. Plus going to social workers. Does. Not. Help. Going to a law office, ditto. Going to any state functionary, ditto. Can people really acknowledge that our societies are unravelling, that the complex bureaucracy in place has no effect when it impinges on any of the woke DEI sanctum sanctorum?
At 72 I've lived here in Asia since 1998. This Muslim raping of white girls is something I read of, watch interviews about, but clearly it's not part of my daily reality. Being here gives me, I suppose, a bit of objectivity. What hits me is that the victims can't rely, in even the most minimal sense, on state institutions. Its futile for a victim even to report it to the police, or other drone-like authorities. I'm surprised white gangs haven't self-assembled, not to gather evidence or intimidate rapists or other Dirty Harry b.s., but to get far more basic.
This must be part of the general decline of Western countries, blah blah, being exploited by young Muslim men. Such violence accelerates the slow motion cratering of social institutions. It seems obvious that it's gone too far for any institutional clean-up campaign to have any effect. I get the sense that there's a profound society-wide paralysis, especially in Europe. Leftist discourse is absolute gospel across Europe for the upper, upper middle, and even much of the middle class, meaning there's no real will to address this, and the dozens of other metastasizing social problems. Europe's 'solution' seems to be brokering a Big War to bury all violent, criminal social problems under a multi-year genocidal killfest The Left can't change, and doesn't believe there's even a problem, and so isn't willing to address it.
Hopefully we'll avoid war. Putin can see of course that the warmongering West is just projecting its own internal failures in this desire for war. He'll deflect it as long as possible. In the meantime though how to solve the problem of Muslim violence, depravity, irresponsibility? Let's forget about going the mega-deportation route. Too many Constitutional obstacles. Which means either Muslims somehow self-correct so the violence ends, OR Muslims voluntarily self-deport. It becomes their sudden, overwhelming, absolute & total choice: to leave. I seriously think that's the only way this happens.
So how to bring about that change of heart in our vile Muslim guests? Simple. Ordinary white & black & Asian people have to go out of their way, every day, in every way, making daily life for our Muslim guests extremely, relentlessly, supremely unpleasant. Dare I say it this could include huge levels of quite visceral, uh, violence. Oh my.
This is when white gangs could really come into their own. But these won't be the ordinary dysfunctional substance-abusing criminal freak show 'gangs'. They'll be the literal inverse of that! Plus they won't actually be 'white', but that's the term the media will apply. They'll just be 100% willing to make life a living hell for the 'Muslim community'.
I don't care whether they're Muslim or Christian or Hindu or Orthodox, can we just find them and give them the death penalty. These evil creatures need to be put down asap.
Being the sensetive person I am I can not support depriving a miscreatant with his life. However a punishment for rape must be employed. Perhaps make the punishment fit the crime. Cut off his penis and balls as well as his hands......violently.
Hmm.. well, ok, if we don't want to kill people, I guess, permanently cripple is the next best option. Ok, yes, cut of his penis, balls, one whole hand, the other hand we can leave just the thumb and pinky so he can us a spoon to eat.. and also cut off his opposite leg. Then send him to prison to serve his time. When or if he gets back out again, he can wear an ankle monitor for the rest of his life.
Those who believe in the moral equivalence of all cultures cannot fathom the notion that some cultures and particularly one that is driven by a supremacy (the "one true god") doctrine and honor bound duty to implement their theocracy (Shariah) wherever they live, is incompatible with a liberal western society that is now in Stockholm syndrome to all other cultures as they self-flagellate about their own mistaught or forgotten culture. Moral cowardice of all western governments deflects to "extremism" or "terrorism" (purity and a tactic) as the problems. The knights Templar holding Castles in Spain did more to protect western civilization than any electable politician of today seeking the votes of Muslims or belonging to a Party that does. The west can either rediscover the values of western civilization and stand up to Islam or the future is eventually Islam. Peaceful reconciliation is the least likely outcome. In the UK, civil war is no longer unimaginable.
I believe that Jesus Christ is the one true God but I also believe God gives us the freedom to make choices and that it is not government or religions right to force a religious belief or choice on individuals.
So, without doubt, it was black Americans who swung Georgia, the PRESIDENT'S way. White suburbanites are the major block to the PRESIDENT. Do you agree
Thank you for reporting this.
It gives me a measure of hope when there appears to be so little.
Here in the UK we're stuck with a left-wing Labour government, and are faced with either another 3 years - when the first 2 have been bad enough, as bad as the Biden administration and potentially worse because our governments have 5 year terms - or another 5 if they call an early election and win due to the bounce in popularity after Starmer finally resigned. I'm astonished and despair at how easily fooled some of the public are. Labour can change its leader but its policies remain the same, and they're ruinous.
The anger in the UK is building, but a coherent cohesive opposition to the Marxists hasn't coalesced into one winning party that can win an election outright. And meanwhile, the UK is circling the drain, and the boats full of illegal migrants keep coming and coming and the government does nothing.
And the legal migrants from countries with incompatible cultures also keep coming....
I agree with what you are saying, but don't pretend you are the "only voice". Elon Musk and Tommy Robinson are the people with the biggest reach that are spreading the word.
And I put out a substack a little while ago that was largely based on someone else's article about the rape gangs.
Indeed. Tommy has been campaigning about it for years, and has served time in prison because of an Establishment that wants him to shut up, or preferably, die.
Read his autobiography: Enemy of the State.
I'm not sure where this comes in, but if we don't have enough to bring the philosophies that divide us into focus, this should certainly do the trick. The divide has been going on for (literally) centuries, and we appear to be no closer to resolution than when it began - - https://x.com/D_Tarczynski/status/2071163180139561304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2071163180139561304%7Ctwgr%5E4cce5faa0ecd9ab047c303c54a48dfbf61d0a5f2%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fpjmedia.com%2Fkevindowneyjr%2F2026%2F06%2F29%2Fcitizen-vigilante-the-film-that-is-opening-eyes-and-terrifying-the-globalists-n4954499