Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Gerow's avatar

Another crackerjack essay. I read them slowly so as to savor the rich language. I really enjoyed your characterization of the upper-class women of that day (which would include my own Boston and Woodstock, Vermont “bluebloods”) as being “entrained to the practice of active virtue.” I suspect there was not a little of James 2:18 in their collective worldview: “Show me your faith without works, and I will show you my faith by my works.” And their status in the community was surely enmeshed with those “somethings that lifted people up.” But unfortunately I suspect there may have been more than a light confectionary dusting of that evil tyrant John Calvin in their noble efforts, which certainly were that.

But they were also rich targets for satire. Am thinking particularly of Indiana humorist George Ade (1866-1944) whose Fables in Slang were hugely popular in the 1890s and early 1900s. His piece on “The Fable of the Good Fairy with the Lorgnette, and why She Got it Good” is really a hoot in lampooning noble pursuits done for the wrong reasons. Ade’s tales always ended with an ironic “moral,“ in this case, “In uplifting, get underneath.”

(But even Ade was down with the practice of active virtue. By the end of 1900, he was earning $1000 a week and had a huge mansion in which he entertained hundreds of orphans on special occasions.)

But I really camped on your last full ‘graph about the new awakening sweeping the world. As an evangelical I will be the first to condemn and reject the “guilt ethic of old line Christianity.” The Christian Church did many wonderful things historically but one of them was not controlling people through guilt while simultaneously picking their pockets. People, as you know, were actually burned at the stake for daring to think outside the priestly “box” and interpreting the Scriptures for themselves.

I don’t see the merging of various religious traditions into a new agey smorgasbord as a good thing. Chrislam? No thank you. The Bible is very clear on what is required for salvation, and it specifically rejects this form of universalism in a number of passages, including John 3:16-17 and 1 John 5:11 and following. I would only add that, in this, we are seeing Biblical prophecy fulfilled before our very eyes: “For the time will come when they will no longer endure sound doctrine; but wanting to have their ears tickled, they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance with their own desires, and they will turn their ears away from the truth and will turn aside to myths.” 2 Timothy 4:3-4.

And the last thing that caught my eye was your final sentence about the last 2,000 years, which sounds like a condemnation of Christianity. In fact, all of human history has been a record of repression, war and hate since right after Day One, whenever that was. Not just the last 2,000 years.

Lovin’ your essays, thanks for sending and keeping me engaged.

Expand full comment
Paul Marks's avatar

Yes - they may get the costumes correct (although I am not sure that even that is true) - but they get the society totally wrong. 19th and early 20th century America was dominated by the ethnic that people should try and improve society (not just their own lives), by their own efforts and their own resources. Instead the television series presents a lazy, parasite, ruling class - more like today than the time period it is supposedly set in. Wealthy people of that time period would not just ignore vast numbers of desperate people living on the streets, or chant "the government must spend more money", they would personally try and find out what had gone wrong - and try and improve things, themselves (by their own efforts).

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts