Elizabeth's optimism is infectious and I hope what she sees emerging gains traction. Just read the book Promethean Action recommends "How the Nation was Won", 1987, by H. Graham Lowry. This is an excellent historical review of the 1630-1754 period to the American Revolution. It shows that the "American System" i.e., merit-based societies, have long struggled against top-down control by those seeking wealth and power by extracting individual's value creation. The same struggle is occurring today. We need to know this history and maintain its relevance in order to constantly push-back against the globalists. The globalists objectify humanity to justify their predatory behavior.
Sooo…much history never taught when I was in school. The Pres Mckinley and Ben Franklin books by Robt Ingraham, a Promethean Action supportive author, reveal detail I never saw in the most touted biographies.
Regarding the liberal women. There is another group of women out there, those living traditional conservative and family oriented lives. It appears that they are producing children at a much higher rate than liberal women, and the liberals seem to be extincting themselves. Some of the rightward shift of young people may be due to there being more of them coming from such families.
I think Europe is really suffering from the lack of a second amendment, it really affects ones probability of being attacked. The teenage girl who pulled a knife and axe out to protect her younger sister from immigrants was lectured by a judge on what a bad thing she did. Bravo to all the Canadians who have recently declared that they will not turn in their firearms.
Do the Canadian entrenched leaders not see a future where the 100 million immigrants simply hang them from lamp posts? Apparently they are arrogant, and the price of arrogance is foolishness.
Why should non-Muslims try to understand Islam? Does it matter?
Let me start by saying: "Islam is unique among the world's major religions at the structural level, that is rarely discussed plainly." it contains, within its own authoritative legal tradition, a framework for governing people who never chose it. What i mean by that is: That those who follow Islam [The house of Islam] are required to govern those who never chose to follow Islam [the non-believers or house of war]. This is not an interpretation from the fringes. It is the mainstream position of classical Sunni jurisprudence. Ibn Kathir, Al-Suyuti, Al-Shafi'i. These are not extremists. They are the tradition's own most respected voices, and they say it plainly.
Every other major religion exists to transform the lives of those who voluntarily embrace it. [Islam does that too]. But Islam also contains a legal architecture that is derived directly from its foundational texts, which divides the world into the house of Islam and the house of war. Islamic doctrine imposes perpetual conflict between Islam and those who do not embrace Islam, until the house of Islam prevails against the non believers. ALL of the Islamic branches and sects across the various Islamic theological and legal schools have codified this. And it has been established by its greatest classical jurists. Mandating ongoing conflict until Islam absorbs the kafirs, and specifies legal conditions under which non-Muslims may be permitted to continue to live, under Islamic authority. And subject to specific taxes, restrictions, and formal ritualized humiliation. This is why Shariah law creeps into our law codes.
There is a second thing non-Muslims need to understand, which is abrogation.
The Quran contains verses of patience, coexistence, and tolerance. It also contains verses commanding perpetual warfare against unbelievers until Islam prevails. These two sets of verses do not coexist as equal options. The Islamic legal tradition has a formal mechanism called naskh. In English we say abrogation. Abrogation is a fancy way of saying that the most recent instructions over ride the older instructions. Like a software update. But it can also help to think of it in a historical seance when looking at the Quran, where later revelations override earlier ones. Because the Quran was not written down all at once, but piecemeal, as it became convenient for Muhammad to receive words from his pet Angel. Al-Suyuti counted more than one hundred peaceful verses abrogated by a single later verse. The peaceful Quran that is typically presented to Western audiences is from the earlier verses. Because the Quran is entirely out of chronological order in an effort to impress the critics by placing the bigger and more impressive chapters at the front of the book and the smaller ones tucked away at the back. This is when Shariah law creeps into our law codes.
And then there is taqiyya. The doctrine that grants permission, under subjectively convenient conditions, to be deceptive. To an enemy, to your wife, or to further the goals of Islamic domination. According to the judgment of the deceiver. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented feature of Islamic jurisprudence, debated and defined by the tradition's own scholars. And agreed upon by the top schools of Islamic studies. This is precisely how shariah law creeps into our institutions and law codes.
None of this means every Muslim is your enemy. It means that understanding Islam from its own authoritative sources, not from its most marketable presentations, is not optional for anyone who wants to think clearly about the world they are living in.
Fabulous interview so much information I do have a reaction to the concept of trappings of peace in the Mid East beingcasinos ,beaches ,fashions, sports. It kind of makes me think that the reason for regime change in Iran from theocracy to democracy is because the theocracy didn’t allow alcohol and gambling which Trump seems to be pushing on Gaza and Mideast. I was hoping we had a nobler reason for getting rid of irans theocracy like to stop stoning , torture , hanging and beheadings of it’s so called political prisoners and mainly of women
Dear Elizabath, I'm 100% in agreement with what you said about Canada.
But, as per your thesis on the Middle East entering a renaissance phase due to the intentions of Trump, Kushner, and Witkoff, I couldn't disagree more.
As per my analysis, these actors (and Trump being the greatest actor) are just hell bent on helping the Zionists who control Israel (they are not real Jews who adhere to the true tenets of Judaism, example here: https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/this-iranian-synagogue-was-bombed) bring about the Greater Israel Project which continues to exercise land theft on a major scale (just look at present day where entire villages in southern Lebanon are being wiped out and taken over by Israel). Same happened in Syria when the Assad regime fell just a couple of years ago.
And note that Trump is now supporting al-Julani (yes, the former Al-Qaeda head chopper tyrant) and even welcomed him in the White House.
I've extensively documented how the Zionists have taken control of not only Trump, but the DOJ, FBI, and essentially Washington D.C. in my 88-page article 'Welcome to West Israel. This is MIGA Land Now! You’ve been Captured & Conquered. What are you gonna do about it?'
Also, follow the money. Trump has received nearly a quarter of a billion dollars just by Myriam Adelson alone. This undoubtedly comes with strings attached - to serve the Zionists interest at the obvious expense of the American, hard-working, people.
I could go on with much more including the unnecessary genocide of Palestinians in Gaza by the Zionist regime that has been supported (financially and militarily) by the U.S. - as I extensively evidenced in my article, but I will leave it at that.
Love you both, been reading Jim Kunstler for many years. He helped me see the left for what it is, more than anyone. Also Jeff Childers, a must read every day.
I wrote about this (my most viewed article ever at over 20k views):
- Apologies to the World: The Great Climate Scam was launched at a Club of Rome Meeting in 1971 by Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, continued by Justin Trudeau (44 pages)
I have a question relating to this quote about 3 minutes into the interview"
"....we have in the ground um all the energy and wealth we need to make everybody in the country a millionaire..."
I wonder if anyone has estimated all of the fed spending judged to be wasteful and or corrupt or otherwise unnecessary - and then determined the rough total amount - to see if it would be enough to at a minimum, or stop annual deficits, and if that then how much fed income tax could be cut - if not all? Elizabeth or anybody? Because depending how significant this is, it could be a hell of a selling point in the next fed election. Imagine telling liberals voters - you have a choice - you can be rich under the Conservatives, or continue to scrape by - or even lose ground under the Libs, and here's the numbers to back it up...
Elizabeth's optimism is infectious and I hope what she sees emerging gains traction. Just read the book Promethean Action recommends "How the Nation was Won", 1987, by H. Graham Lowry. This is an excellent historical review of the 1630-1754 period to the American Revolution. It shows that the "American System" i.e., merit-based societies, have long struggled against top-down control by those seeking wealth and power by extracting individual's value creation. The same struggle is occurring today. We need to know this history and maintain its relevance in order to constantly push-back against the globalists. The globalists objectify humanity to justify their predatory behavior.
I concur - "How the Nation was Won" is a real gem for understanding North American history.
Sooo…much history never taught when I was in school. The Pres Mckinley and Ben Franklin books by Robt Ingraham, a Promethean Action supportive author, reveal detail I never saw in the most touted biographies.
Well said!
Can't wait to listen! James is another one of my favorite morning reads. I truly thank God for Substack; it has kept me sane.
Agree
Terrific talk between you and Jim, who is a friend — I’m in awe of his ability to move between so many disciplines.
Regarding the liberal women. There is another group of women out there, those living traditional conservative and family oriented lives. It appears that they are producing children at a much higher rate than liberal women, and the liberals seem to be extincting themselves. Some of the rightward shift of young people may be due to there being more of them coming from such families.
I think Europe is really suffering from the lack of a second amendment, it really affects ones probability of being attacked. The teenage girl who pulled a knife and axe out to protect her younger sister from immigrants was lectured by a judge on what a bad thing she did. Bravo to all the Canadians who have recently declared that they will not turn in their firearms.
Do the Canadian entrenched leaders not see a future where the 100 million immigrants simply hang them from lamp posts? Apparently they are arrogant, and the price of arrogance is foolishness.
The only bad thing the girl did was fail to neuter the invading pedoperp
Listened to this when he posted it — excellent!! Refreshing to hear truth!
I ain't gonna miss two of my favorites here!
Glad to hear this interview with two people I greatly admire for their work. Experienced, knowledgeable, thought provoking and encouraging. Thank you.
Both of you are must reads. So glad the two of you got together!! Like a Jeff Childers (of coffeeandcovid.com fame) and Mr Mike Rowe combo!
Why should non-Muslims try to understand Islam? Does it matter?
Let me start by saying: "Islam is unique among the world's major religions at the structural level, that is rarely discussed plainly." it contains, within its own authoritative legal tradition, a framework for governing people who never chose it. What i mean by that is: That those who follow Islam [The house of Islam] are required to govern those who never chose to follow Islam [the non-believers or house of war]. This is not an interpretation from the fringes. It is the mainstream position of classical Sunni jurisprudence. Ibn Kathir, Al-Suyuti, Al-Shafi'i. These are not extremists. They are the tradition's own most respected voices, and they say it plainly.
Every other major religion exists to transform the lives of those who voluntarily embrace it. [Islam does that too]. But Islam also contains a legal architecture that is derived directly from its foundational texts, which divides the world into the house of Islam and the house of war. Islamic doctrine imposes perpetual conflict between Islam and those who do not embrace Islam, until the house of Islam prevails against the non believers. ALL of the Islamic branches and sects across the various Islamic theological and legal schools have codified this. And it has been established by its greatest classical jurists. Mandating ongoing conflict until Islam absorbs the kafirs, and specifies legal conditions under which non-Muslims may be permitted to continue to live, under Islamic authority. And subject to specific taxes, restrictions, and formal ritualized humiliation. This is why Shariah law creeps into our law codes.
There is a second thing non-Muslims need to understand, which is abrogation.
The Quran contains verses of patience, coexistence, and tolerance. It also contains verses commanding perpetual warfare against unbelievers until Islam prevails. These two sets of verses do not coexist as equal options. The Islamic legal tradition has a formal mechanism called naskh. In English we say abrogation. Abrogation is a fancy way of saying that the most recent instructions over ride the older instructions. Like a software update. But it can also help to think of it in a historical seance when looking at the Quran, where later revelations override earlier ones. Because the Quran was not written down all at once, but piecemeal, as it became convenient for Muhammad to receive words from his pet Angel. Al-Suyuti counted more than one hundred peaceful verses abrogated by a single later verse. The peaceful Quran that is typically presented to Western audiences is from the earlier verses. Because the Quran is entirely out of chronological order in an effort to impress the critics by placing the bigger and more impressive chapters at the front of the book and the smaller ones tucked away at the back. This is when Shariah law creeps into our law codes.
And then there is taqiyya. The doctrine that grants permission, under subjectively convenient conditions, to be deceptive. To an enemy, to your wife, or to further the goals of Islamic domination. According to the judgment of the deceiver. It is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented feature of Islamic jurisprudence, debated and defined by the tradition's own scholars. And agreed upon by the top schools of Islamic studies. This is precisely how shariah law creeps into our institutions and law codes.
None of this means every Muslim is your enemy. It means that understanding Islam from its own authoritative sources, not from its most marketable presentations, is not optional for anyone who wants to think clearly about the world they are living in.
That is what my work is about.
"You can't have World Wars without globalists." -Said someone obviously after the second one.
Fabulous interview so much information I do have a reaction to the concept of trappings of peace in the Mid East beingcasinos ,beaches ,fashions, sports. It kind of makes me think that the reason for regime change in Iran from theocracy to democracy is because the theocracy didn’t allow alcohol and gambling which Trump seems to be pushing on Gaza and Mideast. I was hoping we had a nobler reason for getting rid of irans theocracy like to stop stoning , torture , hanging and beheadings of it’s so called political prisoners and mainly of women
Dear Elizabath, I'm 100% in agreement with what you said about Canada.
But, as per your thesis on the Middle East entering a renaissance phase due to the intentions of Trump, Kushner, and Witkoff, I couldn't disagree more.
As per my analysis, these actors (and Trump being the greatest actor) are just hell bent on helping the Zionists who control Israel (they are not real Jews who adhere to the true tenets of Judaism, example here: https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/this-iranian-synagogue-was-bombed) bring about the Greater Israel Project which continues to exercise land theft on a major scale (just look at present day where entire villages in southern Lebanon are being wiped out and taken over by Israel). Same happened in Syria when the Assad regime fell just a couple of years ago.
And note that Trump is now supporting al-Julani (yes, the former Al-Qaeda head chopper tyrant) and even welcomed him in the White House.
I've extensively documented how the Zionists have taken control of not only Trump, but the DOJ, FBI, and essentially Washington D.C. in my 88-page article 'Welcome to West Israel. This is MIGA Land Now! You’ve been Captured & Conquered. What are you gonna do about it?'
(extensive receipts included).
https://fournier.substack.com/p/welcome-to-west-israel-this-is-miga
Also, follow the money. Trump has received nearly a quarter of a billion dollars just by Myriam Adelson alone. This undoubtedly comes with strings attached - to serve the Zionists interest at the obvious expense of the American, hard-working, people.
I could go on with much more including the unnecessary genocide of Palestinians in Gaza by the Zionist regime that has been supported (financially and militarily) by the U.S. - as I extensively evidenced in my article, but I will leave it at that.
- Respectfully,
Love you both, been reading Jim Kunstler for many years. He helped me see the left for what it is, more than anyone. Also Jeff Childers, a must read every day.
This is worth a listen and definitely explains where Canada is and why…
https://youtu.be/Zp0G7VFi9OU?si=OPPafkBqLKPJi1Z_
Yep,
I wrote about this (my most viewed article ever at over 20k views):
- Apologies to the World: The Great Climate Scam was launched at a Club of Rome Meeting in 1971 by Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, continued by Justin Trudeau (44 pages)
https://fournier.substack.com/p/apologies-to-the-world-the-great
The Rothschilds took control of London City in 1815 following the battle of Waterloo. So, it’s once again a central bank behind the evils.
I have a question relating to this quote about 3 minutes into the interview"
"....we have in the ground um all the energy and wealth we need to make everybody in the country a millionaire..."
I wonder if anyone has estimated all of the fed spending judged to be wasteful and or corrupt or otherwise unnecessary - and then determined the rough total amount - to see if it would be enough to at a minimum, or stop annual deficits, and if that then how much fed income tax could be cut - if not all? Elizabeth or anybody? Because depending how significant this is, it could be a hell of a selling point in the next fed election. Imagine telling liberals voters - you have a choice - you can be rich under the Conservatives, or continue to scrape by - or even lose ground under the Libs, and here's the numbers to back it up...